This is a class blog for the students of POLSCI 426: Congressional Politics at the University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee.

Should Dems ignore the Southerns?

That's the debate going on over at Salon (you don't need to register to view the stories, but you do need to wait through a short commercial, which will give you a one-day access pass to the site).

Essentially, the two sides are arguing over whether the Democratic Party should focus energies on keeping the Southern Democrat base within the party or whether party officials should just ignore the South.

In the second piece, I found this quote quite good:
Sure, the overall trend has been toward the GOP, but that's hard to avoid,
since the starting point was a one-party Democratic region.

New Congress unlikely to rush toughest issues

This is an interesting article that reports on the slow road for legislating that the new Congress will face.

The main issues that are being discussed are the following:
Iraq
Wiretap policy
Immigration

Dems warn Iraq government: No rubber-stamp support

This article is basically about the plans that the Democrats have when it comes to their legislating in the NEW CONGRESS. It also touches on the violence going on in Iraq right now and the fact that Iraq should expect changes in the United States' role in that region.

At least they have a plan, it's better than nothing. LOL

Looking Beyond 2006

Jacob Weisberg of Slate is the most informed person, it seems. He says about the recent elections:
The conservative era in American politics, which has coincided with my
entire adult lifetime, came to an end two weeks ago.

Amazing that he can come to such a conclusion and the Democrats haven't even formally taken power yet. And he goes on to say:
So, if I'm correct that the conservative era is kaput, what comes next? No
one knows! But perhaps we can speculate about some of the candidates for
successor. Here are four possibilities, moving from left to right.

The four possibilities: A New Progressivism, Clintonism Continued, The Muddled Middle and Bushism Without Bush.

I think either an era of Clintonism Continued or Bushism Without Bush remains the most likely ones of the four mentioned in the article. And I think a Clintonism Continued would be my guess for how the American public shapes the scope of the political landscape in years to come -- particularly in 2008.

Happy Thanksgiving Everyone!!!

^___^

Sort of relating to Congress..

"True freedom is protecting Americans by letting the NSA monitor their email and phone calls by the millions without a warrant, US Attorney General Alberto Gonzales explained to Air Force Academy cadets in a speech last week.

It's a mistake to regard such Gestapo tactics as compromising freedom, he told the young officers in training. "This [antagonistic] view is shortsighted. Its definition of freedom - one utterly divorced from civic responsibility - is superficial and is itself a grave threat to the liberty and security of the American people".

Only days earlier, vice president Dick Cheney had denounced an August court decision in Michigan that found the NSA wiretap program unconstitutional as "an indefensible act of judicial overreaching".

It should surprise no one that the Bush administration is mounting a PR campaign to sell its illegal mass wiretap program, even though it's hardly a hot news item at the moment (the Michigan decision is being appealed). The sales job is directed toward the lame duck Republican Congress, in hopes of having the domestic spying program legalised after the fact, before Democrats take control of the Hill."

So does anyone think that they'll be able to get it pushed through? I personally don't; isn't trying to get it legalized to "supplement" the authority that already exist rather pointless to if it was already legit? I think even if they tried to push this through it'll take something to let the general public know and from them I'm sure the general feeling will be of displeasure. Time will tell.

We should pat ourselves on the back...unless you didn't vote..then don't pat yourself on the back

"Washington - Young voters carried more political weight in Wisconsin than in virtually any other state in the Nov. 7 midterm elections.

That is one of the most striking findings about the state in an examination of exit poll data from across the country.

Voters age 18-29 made up 17% of the Wisconsin electorate - more than anywhere else except Montana (also 17%). Nationally, young voters made up between 12% and 13% of the electorate.

"We lost all these college-town seats," Janesville congressman Paul Ryan said. "The marriage amendment clearly complicated the turnout situation, which did not play to our benefit in many ways."

According to a preliminary national estimate by the Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement at the University of Maryland, about 24% of eligible voters between 18 and 29 went to the polls Nov. 7, up from 20% in the last midterm in 2002. National turnout for voters of all ages is estimated at a little more than 40% in 2006."

Texas loses lengthy clout in Congress

This article has it all –distribution of power, junior members and redistricting. Enjoy.

House Democrats Pick Their Leader

House Democrats chose Representative Steny H. Hoyer of Maryland majority leader. The interesting thing was that there was fighting amongst party members. Hoyer was chosen despite the fact that he wasn't the candidate favored by speaker of the house Nansy Pelosi. John Murtha was favored by Pelosi, who got 86 votes compared with 149, which were received by his opponents.

Lieberman: Payback Time?

I was watching Scarborough Country on MSNBC and one of the things that came up was the issue with Joe Lieberman most likely being bitter because of the fact that he probably feels that the Democrats left him behind to support Lamont. Now that Lieberman has won over Lamont, could it be possible in anyone's eyes that he might become a turncoat and consider becoming a republican. It was stated on SC that he had more votes from republicans than independents, so I am wondering what anyone thinks of this because he could tip the balance when it comes to the power in the Senate.

Could quicker Rumsfeld exit have kept GOP in power?

The article is basically about speculations about whether or not Donald Rumsfeld's resignation could have helped the Republicans stay in power if it had been done before the Midterm Elections. I agree pretty much with Bolten when he states:

"I could argue the politics of it either way," White House Chief of Staff Joshua Bolten told CNN. "It might have been disheartening for people to see a sudden change at that moment, two or three weeks before the election. But however you view the politics of it, it doesn't matter. The president wasn't ready to make the decision until the last week. And he was determined not to inject politics into one of the most important national security decisions he has got to make."

I don't think it would have made much of a difference either way. Most people most likely would have shrugged it off and voted the way they wanted. Also, it has been discussed before on a few political cable news shows that a significant amount of people voted absentee, including me, so whatever the circumstance it would have been too late or fruitless to make an impact.

Lieberman: Call me a Democrat

The title pretty much says it all.

Disenchanted Chafee may bail on GOP

Here is a short article on how the most liberal republican of congress might jump ship after his election loss. Interesting that he waited so long to decide that he might leave the party.

Redistricting: Home to Roost

"The trade-off in redistricting is between safety and maximizing the numbers," says Alan I. Abramowitz, a political scientist at Emory University in Atlanta. "You can't do both."

Political Parties in a Critical Era

Thanks to Anthony Cetrano for pointing out that this article was not available on jstor. You can find it at the above link on my website or at the site for the American Politics Review.

Iraq: Ailing Democratic Party since 2006

Not surprisingly, the New York Times picks up on how the Democrats used the war in Iraq to leverage their way into Congress.

The story talks about how Iraq had fallen off of the media's radar and how a bloody and violent month of October overseas helped to raise the profile of the war again to a point where Democrats could use it as a means to Congressional ends.

But the White House helped too, they say:

Republicans, normally sure-footed this decade, reacted with a tentativeness that they called evidence of a divergence between a White House that viewed a victory in Iraq as central to Mr. Bush’s image and Republican candidates who saw the war as poisoning an already difficult re-election environment.

Senior Republican strategists said they told candidates to avoid talking about the war, and even to distance themselves from it, and urged the White House to change its approach, at least through November. But that strategy was undercut by Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney, who kept making the case for victory in forum after forum, ensuring that the issue remained in public view.

What a novel approach for Democrats.

After Years On the Outs, New York Comes Back In

“Now when I say to one of my colleagues, New York needs something, or I need something, they’ll be more amenable.”
- Chuck Schumer

Democrat win in Montana

Jon tester wins for democrats in Montana, leaving Virgina to be decided, "Mr. Tester’s victory means that the Senate will at the least be tied 50-50 between Democrats and Republicans, but effectively the Republicans would remain in control in that case because Vice President Dick Cheney has a tie-breaking vote".

Bush appoints new Secretary of Defense

Donald Rumsfeld has put in his resignation as Secretary of Defense and President Bush has appointed former head of the CIA, Robert Gates. Little information is available at this time but President Bush has announced that he believe Gates will assist him in "Staying the Course" or "Changing the course" or something is going on with the course at least.

Democratic Majority in Senate

Democrats have defeated the Republican incumbents in Rhode Island, Pennsylvanis, and Ohio. Right now they are winning in other three, Virginia, James Webb(Democrat) leading with very slime majority 49.6 to 49.3%, 99/8% votes counted. Missouri, Democratic challenger McCaskill leading by 49.5 to 47.3 over her opponents with 88.4% votes counted. In Montana Democrat challenger Jon Tester leading by 50.7% to 46.8% over the opponent with 64.1% counted.