This is a class blog for the students of POLSCI 426: Congressional Politics at the University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee.
Feingold, Ryan, McCain unite to curb earmarks
Since the line item veto was struck down by the Supreme Court in 1998, McCain and Feingold introduced new legislation gives Congress the ability to accept or reject each item the president tries to veto. That way, Congress retains control over the process while forcing lawmakers to justify spending items to their colleagues.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(164)
-
▼
March
(45)
- What has become of the D.C. full-vote measure? The...
- Gates: U.S. Not Prepared to Respond to North Korea...
- What is the point?
- U.S. Congress Cautiously Welcomes New Afghan Plan
- Democrats Agree on Budget's Outline
- Barney Frank, King of Pork
- Congress, Largest Landlord in the U.S.
- Democrats Take Knife to Obama's Budget
- Congressional Chestbeating?
- Administration launches plan to initially buy up h...
- Law Professor Who Advised Obama Says House AIG Bil...
- Feingold/Ryan unveil earmark veto plan
- Team Effort in the House to Overhaul Health Care
- What Would Happen Without Local Newspapers?
- Are earmarks really so bad?
- Hillbillies: Don't Worry
- Median Voter Theory in Action
- Lawmaker Tried to Aid Bank Partly Owned by Husband
- Steele In Hot Water Over Abortion Comments
- Senate Clears Spending After Fractious Debate
- Big Test for New Chairman
- Congress having difficulty evaluating its carbon f...
- Don’t Rely on Bush’s Signing Statements, Obama Orders
- Chinese harassed Navy Ship....
- Republicans Look for a Reliever in Kentucky
- Congress passes stopgap bill to avoid shutdown
- Senator in Search of the "Truth"
- House Passes Mortgage Bankruptcy Bill
- RNC member calls on Michael Steele to resign
- Republicans attempt to stall spending bill
- Feingold, Ryan, McCain unite to curb earmarks
- Feingold Opposes Spending Bill
- House Rep to Ban Gitmo Detainees from U.S. Soil
- Senate Debates $410 Billion '09 Spending Bill
- In Senate, Bipartisan Love of Earmarks
- Filibusters: The Senate’s Self-Inflicted Wound
- Bring on the bacon!
- Interesting videos on new Reps on Capitol Hill
- Any other Alternatives?
- Snow Cancels Pelosi's Plans
- The Phantom Filibuster
- Kansas Governor to head Department of Health and H...
- Kohl seeks 401(k) relief
- Frustrated G.O.P. Tries to Drive Wedge Between Oba...
- Hell Hath No Fury Like...
-
▼
March
(45)
1 comment:
The line-item veto is one of the most terrifying powers to give to a president. Vesting that much authority to the executive to override individual items in a bill not only takes the legislative process one step further into confusion, but also grants the presidents pen to dip that much further into Congress.
The presidential veto, as it stands, was a brilliant ability set by the Founding Fathers to check the legislature. However, granting the "line-item" veto, even if only for spending bills concerning "pork," is rather extreme. The next step may as well be allowing the president to control debate on the floors of Congress and make sure that it is precisely tailored to the executive's preferences.
This is a matter best left to Congress. If they are ineffective in settling the dispute over lines of spending, then further debate is necessary in both chambers of Congress.
Post a Comment