This is a class blog for the students of POLSCI 426: Congressional Politics at the University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee.
Foreign Relations Committee Opposes More Troops
Earlier today, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee voted 12-9 to approve Joe Biden’s (D-DE) opposition resolution to President Bush’s proposed 21,500-soldier addition to those already deployed in Iraq. This means that the opposition resolution will be heard on the Senate floor within the next week or so. A possible competing resolution would be John Wagner’s (R-VA) American forces clarification proposal, which calls for more concrete benchmarks in managing the Iraqi insurgency as well as making clear that American troops are to remain uninvolved in incidents not directly concerning the Iraqi government (anything that is sectarian violence and not sedition or treason).
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(218)
-
▼
January
(21)
- Senate Allies of Bush Work to Halt Iraq Vote
- South Dakota legislator censured for misconduct
- Tie CEO pay to performance, Bush says in State of ...
- The House passed a $463.5 billion spending bill We...
- paul ryan
- Reid Land Deal Raises Questions
- Doyle proposed $225 million plan to help UW Colleges.
- Pelosi heads to Afghanistan as bill is discussed t...
- Feingold to Chair the Hearing on Congress's Power ...
- House voting rights widen
- Big States’ Push for Earlier Vote Scrambles Race
- Senate Committee Approves Lt. Gen. David Petraeus ...
- Bush seeks over $10 billion in aid for Afghanistan
- Cheney Calls Reporter's Question About Gay Daughte...
- A winter of GOP discontent
- Congresswoman Gwen Moore and H.R. 5
- Doyle asks for smoking ban
- Foreign Relations Committee Opposes More Troops
- Senate Republicans block minimum wage hike
- Kerry will not seek White House in 2008
- Welcome to Spring
-
▼
January
(21)
2 comments:
Can the deployment of more troops to Iraq really serve any great purpose? To me it seems just as affective as trying to put out your buring house by using a garden house. The situation has gotten away from us, and many of the republicans are even begging to realize that we need another option, one that can be utilized without the expense of more soldiers lives. Even if you do create a benchmark, there is no stopping those who wish to involve U.S. troops, by attacking them.
It is unfortunate that Political strategy involves peoples lives, but the democrats have to be like pigs-in-you-know-what right now. Pelosi reports she won't cut funding (for the sake of the troops) (it's in the 110th congress primer). The Democrats will likely let the President continue his plan, more seats for them in 2008. As the republicans distance themselves to keep their jobs, it will reflect poorly on the party as a whole. We wont see the democrats unravel until the primaries.
Post a Comment