Why don't Americans elect scientists
I found this to be a very interesting article on who is considered electable and what makes an American politician. I found that combining the middle, often sound byte (technical spelling intentional) adverse, positions that scientists take on issues with the drive to the extreme of the current parties in the primaries held for most elections makes a scientist unelectable in most current political elections. A house election where there is a bi-annual need to prove one's loyalty to the party, is the opposite of what most sciencetists want to do.
This is a class blog for the students of POLSCI 426: Congressional Politics at the University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2012
(110)
-
▼
February
(23)
- That Lunch Table Shrinks (Again)
- Midterm on Wednesday
- Richard Lugar, the Grandfather of the Indiana GOP,...
- Santorum Makes Case for Religion in Public Sphere
- "Road" Island Lampoon of Joe Biden
- re: Harry Reid, U.S. Senate Majority Leader
- Intra-party struggles
- Representative Vulnerability
- Debate on an Issue
- Upsetting the apple cart?
- The public doesn't know the truth An article abou...
- Here is an article about the Super PACs and the im...
- Another Look at Citizens United
- Single-minded seekers of re-election
- Republicans’ Bid to Extend Tax Cut May Shift Blame...
- UPDATE 4-Obama birth-control rule stokes election-...
- Who is electable?
- Vulnerable Incumbent MoC
- Trustees Vs Delegates, Wisconsin Edition
- First Nuclear Reactors in 30 years
- Three-state sweep by Santorum bolsters his case
- Retirement Funds
- And We're Back!
-
▼
February
(23)
No comments:
Post a Comment