This is a class blog for the students of POLSCI 426: Congressional Politics at the University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee.
Average Dem. Incumbent loss of Vote Share Due to Healthcare Reform
Interesting article that outlines a recent study showing that the average incumbent Congressional Democrat lost 5.8 percent of the vote due to their voting for healthcare reform. I am skeptical of this stat, how often have you heard a partisan voter throw up a lame excuse for not having voted for the opposing ideology? At least 5% of the time I presume.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2012
(110)
-
▼
March
(33)
- Another budget show down?l
- Rangel asks colleagues for help
- Forecasting Congressional Elections
- Gwen Moore Recounts Her Rape Ordeal
- Recent Hearing to Stop USPS Bleed Out
- Delaying Highway Funding Bill
- Republican Suggests Moving GOP by Support Democrats
- Members of Congress Taking a Position (at the Line...
- Classic Overreach by Reyes
- Retirement
- Michelle Bachmann Campaign Ad
- Rep. Steve King Ad
- Aaron Schock's TV ad
- Spencer Bachus isn't a fan of Obamacare
- Roscoe Reynolds Campaign ad
- Ed Perlmutter Colorado Rep. Ads
- Schawosky
- Marcy Kaptur 2012
- John Boehner Sighs
- Average Dem. Incumbent loss of Vote Share Due to H...
- Rep. Hoyer Reads the Tea Leaves- Sees Big Win for ...
- JOBS Passes but Who Wins?
- "Joe the Plumber" to face Rep. Kaptur in Ohio race
- Scouting and political leanings How much does the...
- 2012 fundraising: Congressional races get more att...
- On Their Own
- Illegal Campaign?
- Endorsing Mitt Romney
- Creating a More Partisan Senate
- Not About Congress But I Posted it Anyway
- Dicks to leave Congress
- Weird Interview for Rhode Island's Senate Seat
- Birth Control Amendment Rejected by Senate
-
▼
March
(33)
3 comments:
I don't understand your skepticism. Could you clarify? Did you click to read the actual paper? Maybe they account for your concerns? Typically, mainstream reporting on scientific research often requires simplification, making it hard to judge the veracity of the claims or interesting nuance.
The actual study found the link between an average 5 % drop of incumbents who had voted for health care reform and those who did not. Upon a 3rd look at it, there does not seem to be any real interaction between the researcher and the voters i.e. a sample size to potentially tie a voting decision to an M.C. that had voted for health care reform. I just wonder if there is not a great overlying factor of "leap frog voting," vs. actual drop in support due to health care reform votes. It still seems possible that a larger trend may be at play.
Post a Comment