This article does not include information I find critical in determining if we should value this polls information or not, for instance how many people were polled, what did they state as their political allegiance if they have one, and what was the age group of those polled. The ultimate question though is even if that information was provided can we still trust this poll, or any other poll?
In the article itself it states that "The problem with interpreting the generic ballot is that a national poll cannot produce the same results that 435 separate polls in 435 House districts would produce," so does that mean we shouldn't pay much attention to these polls that claim to be the "poll of polls" and what not?
This is a class blog for the students of POLSCI 426: Congressional Politics at the University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(327)
-
▼
October
(51)
- VOTE OR DIE!
- ADs ADs Ads
- Joe Manchin Ad
- Schumer and Durbin's under the radar play for leader
- In Minnesota, A Tight Race for Governor With No In...
- Best and Worst of the 2010 Political Ads
- Miller for Alaska Ad
- The Making of a Political Viral Video
- Chris Coons the Taxman
- Carly for California Ad
- "Different This Time Around?"
- Feingold v Johnson
- Powerful Statement
- Where to Donate?
- Rand Paul Attack Ad
- Ron Johnson White Board
- I Am Not a Witch... Not that there's anything wron...
- Really
- Feingold and Johnson in a dead heat according to r...
- Democrats & the House
- Keeping the Theme going
- Follow Up Re: Money in Elections/Robert's America
- Don’t Follow the Money
- John Roberts' America
- Debates
- Obama Campaign Trail in 2010
- Crunch time=lots of commericals
- Realignment of Southern Party Politics
- Gutter Politics
- Don't asked don't tell because I don't want to know
- The Education of President Obama
- TV ADS
- Feingold v. Johnson Leads in Campaign Ads
- Tea Party Targeting Dems
- funding secrets!
- A Vote Some Dems Might Regret
- Advertisements for Democrats?
- Debates Tonight (Friday, 10/8)
- Poll Results
- Money=votes? maybe not
- The Founding Fathers versus the Tea Party
- Spending for the 2010 midterm elections
- Can we really trust polls?
- Recession isn't over?
- Historic election?
- The NFL vs. Russ Feingold for Senate For a 4th Time
- Obama Care number two
- Progressives in Madtown not motivated
- Only 39 Percent Would Vote to Re-Elect Obama in 2012
- Delaware Race Is Bellwether: All Politics Is Now N...
- Murdoch tells Congress to secure Borders
-
▼
October
(51)
1 comment:
Another interesting fold in the debate regarding how reliable polling data has been in predicting election outcomes has been the introduction of automated polling. some regard it as the future of polling while others question its validity. short term there seems to be some evidence to suggest it may indeed be a very accurate way to predict voting behavior however questions remain!
Post a Comment