This is a class blog for the students of POLSCI 426: Congressional Politics at the University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(327)
-
▼
October
(51)
- VOTE OR DIE!
- ADs ADs Ads
- Joe Manchin Ad
- Schumer and Durbin's under the radar play for leader
- In Minnesota, A Tight Race for Governor With No In...
- Best and Worst of the 2010 Political Ads
- Miller for Alaska Ad
- The Making of a Political Viral Video
- Chris Coons the Taxman
- Carly for California Ad
- "Different This Time Around?"
- Feingold v Johnson
- Powerful Statement
- Where to Donate?
- Rand Paul Attack Ad
- Ron Johnson White Board
- I Am Not a Witch... Not that there's anything wron...
- Really
- Feingold and Johnson in a dead heat according to r...
- Democrats & the House
- Keeping the Theme going
- Follow Up Re: Money in Elections/Robert's America
- Don’t Follow the Money
- John Roberts' America
- Debates
- Obama Campaign Trail in 2010
- Crunch time=lots of commericals
- Realignment of Southern Party Politics
- Gutter Politics
- Don't asked don't tell because I don't want to know
- The Education of President Obama
- TV ADS
- Feingold v. Johnson Leads in Campaign Ads
- Tea Party Targeting Dems
- funding secrets!
- A Vote Some Dems Might Regret
- Advertisements for Democrats?
- Debates Tonight (Friday, 10/8)
- Poll Results
- Money=votes? maybe not
- The Founding Fathers versus the Tea Party
- Spending for the 2010 midterm elections
- Can we really trust polls?
- Recession isn't over?
- Historic election?
- The NFL vs. Russ Feingold for Senate For a 4th Time
- Obama Care number two
- Progressives in Madtown not motivated
- Only 39 Percent Would Vote to Re-Elect Obama in 2012
- Delaware Race Is Bellwether: All Politics Is Now N...
- Murdoch tells Congress to secure Borders
-
▼
October
(51)
2 comments:
once again, what happened to separation of church and state? this ad is too funny, but it shouldn't matter what his religion is.
Another interesting ad. As for separation of church and state, another Tea Party candidate, Christine O'Donnell (as well as many others) questions whether the belief in separation of church and state is legitimate: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/10/19/AR2010101902501.html
Should Rand Paul be attacked for his religious beliefs using the same logic as other members of his party? At the same time, Rand Paul opposes faith-based support through tax exemption while President Bush supported faith-based orgs. Is this a legitimate issue to discuss in political campaigns?
Post a Comment