This is a class blog for the students of POLSCI 426: Congressional Politics at the University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee.
Arizona's Other Senator Wants to Fix Leaks
On March 1st, Senator John Kyl (R – AZ) proposed an amendment this week to an anti-terrorism bill that would criminalize disclosure of at least three distinct classes of congressional reports. Kyl’s amendment primarily targets members of Congress and Capitol Hill staff, as the only people in a position to disclosure the content of such offline reports would be Congress members or other staff present during the issuing of the reports. This is actually Kyl’s third amendment to an anti-terrorism bill attempting to criminalize a broader array of information disclosure (via expanding the definition of “classified communications”) as well as increasing penalties for such offenses (such as doubling the maximum prison term for such disclosure). Although the Journal Sentinel did not report much congressional support for the bill as amended, that will be revealed in the next week or so when the amended bill hits the floor. Because the first two Kyl amendments were too draconian relative to the status quo of restricted communications, they were voted down in the Senate. Perhaps Kyl’s third try will be modest enough (adding only three groups of congressional reports) to obtain a simple majority (given the congressional emphasis on national security), but it is unlikely that the House will agree on the same provisions because the sentiment there is somewhat more populist and therefore in favor of a shift away from the high-security status quo but towards fewer classifications of communications, not more.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(218)
-
▼
March
(57)
- Rep. Dingell Balances Interests to Avoid Dingleberry
- karl rove rapping..for real at a fundraiser
- Senate Sets Stage For Iraq Face-Off
- Odds, Ends, and Misc. Things
- Comedian in Chief?
- House Democrats Tout Budget as Deficit-Reducing
- Edwards’s Cancer Has Spread Into One of Her Hips
- Democrats take another step forward in war legisla...
- McGee spends $10,185 to defend seat
- McCain's MySpace Page Hacked
- The March Madness Loophole
- My Fellow Americans: Pls Post a Comment!
- Congress Expands Scope of Inquiries Into Justice D...
- Democrats Pass Iraq Appropriations Bill
- A Brave New World of Political Skulduggery?
- need a partner
- 2008: March Money Madness
- White House issues veto threat on Iraq pullout bill
- "No" votes and not showing up to vote doesn't make...
- Just like a Broadway play, congressional hearings ...
- US legislation could set Iraq pullout date
- Dems Demand more Cash
- Hillary Invokes Proletarian Interests
- Hagel Stays Out of Presidential Race
- partner anyone?
- YouTube Sets Aside 'Channel' for Presidential Cand...
- The New Dean Political Plan
- Emanuel tells freshmen to avoid Stephen Colbert
- Democrat David Obey attacks "idiot liberals"
- Happy "Sunshine Week" Everybody!
- Veto players always get their way
- Legislator's love triangle implodes
- Dems to Russert, Wallace, and Sheiffer: You're on ...
- Dems optimistic about Iraq plan passage
- need a partner?
- Lantos Introduces Iran Sanctions Legislation
- Democrats Look to Scrap Spending Bill Riders
- Pelosi Reveals Who's Who On Global Warming Panel
- Paperless Ballot Ban
- Senators argue about Alberto Gonzales
- Ted Kennedy Talks: Do I Listen??
- Bush Asks Congress for Armed Forces Funding Shift
- Democrats’ Iraq Plan Draws Broad Support, Poll Shows
- House Dems Face Uphill Battle Over Iraq
- It's Like I'm On Crazy Pills or Something!
- Broad Support for Dems' Iraq Plan?
- Obama pays parking tickets...only took him 17 years
- Kohl pushes anti-trust issue
- Scooter Libby
- Two Freshmen Learn the Perils of Talking Too Much
- Senate to question Army on Walter Reed
- obama vs. hillary part 2393893
- Arizona's Other Senator Wants to Fix Leaks
- Children's Health Care on Agenda
- Democrats' plan: Meet goals or bring troops home
- Republicans United in Opposition?
- Democrats eye cuts to 2008 Iraq war request
-
▼
March
(57)
No comments:
Post a Comment