This article describes House Democrats’ attempts on March 28th to convince other representatives that their $2.9 trillion budget will result in a $153 billion surplus in 2012 despite planned increases in spending on national security, defense, education, and veterans’ affairs. They must be referring to a peak surplus for that year alone because the national deficit currently exceeds $3.2 trillion. Even if Democrats prevent an extension of the tax cuts enacted by Congress in 2001 and 2003, real income will not rise enough to produce enough of a surplus unless there is a drastic tax increase against corporations and other wealthy elite, who in turn might retaliate by raising the prices of goods and services beyond the reach of working-class individuals and families, which could spark a series of congressionally enacted minimum wage increases, which would require the retention of a Democratic majority…All the while paving the way for the small business owner to rise from the ashes, offering cheaper prices for goods and services as the corporations attempt to out-price the average consumer as revenge for the proletariat-led congressional rebellion against tax havens for the rich.
I believe the key sentence in the article is, “Under Congress' budget process, the annual budget resolution is a nonbinding outline that guides future legislation.” By showcasing partisan ideals about the budget, the annual budget bill provides ample opportunity for members of Congress to demonstrate their show horse appeal. The median vote theorem predicts that the mean effect of all appropriations bills approved by this Congress will reduce the deficit by several million dollars, a small step towards halving the deficit by 2012 (I doubt a net surplus will result by then) and a sustainable reduction that Republicans are likely to continue or even build upon if fiscally moderate Democrats happen to lose the majority.
This is a class blog for the students of POLSCI 426: Congressional Politics at the University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(218)
-
▼
March
(57)
- Rep. Dingell Balances Interests to Avoid Dingleberry
- karl rove rapping..for real at a fundraiser
- Senate Sets Stage For Iraq Face-Off
- Odds, Ends, and Misc. Things
- Comedian in Chief?
- House Democrats Tout Budget as Deficit-Reducing
- Edwards’s Cancer Has Spread Into One of Her Hips
- Democrats take another step forward in war legisla...
- McGee spends $10,185 to defend seat
- McCain's MySpace Page Hacked
- The March Madness Loophole
- My Fellow Americans: Pls Post a Comment!
- Congress Expands Scope of Inquiries Into Justice D...
- Democrats Pass Iraq Appropriations Bill
- A Brave New World of Political Skulduggery?
- need a partner
- 2008: March Money Madness
- White House issues veto threat on Iraq pullout bill
- "No" votes and not showing up to vote doesn't make...
- Just like a Broadway play, congressional hearings ...
- US legislation could set Iraq pullout date
- Dems Demand more Cash
- Hillary Invokes Proletarian Interests
- Hagel Stays Out of Presidential Race
- partner anyone?
- YouTube Sets Aside 'Channel' for Presidential Cand...
- The New Dean Political Plan
- Emanuel tells freshmen to avoid Stephen Colbert
- Democrat David Obey attacks "idiot liberals"
- Happy "Sunshine Week" Everybody!
- Veto players always get their way
- Legislator's love triangle implodes
- Dems to Russert, Wallace, and Sheiffer: You're on ...
- Dems optimistic about Iraq plan passage
- need a partner?
- Lantos Introduces Iran Sanctions Legislation
- Democrats Look to Scrap Spending Bill Riders
- Pelosi Reveals Who's Who On Global Warming Panel
- Paperless Ballot Ban
- Senators argue about Alberto Gonzales
- Ted Kennedy Talks: Do I Listen??
- Bush Asks Congress for Armed Forces Funding Shift
- Democrats’ Iraq Plan Draws Broad Support, Poll Shows
- House Dems Face Uphill Battle Over Iraq
- It's Like I'm On Crazy Pills or Something!
- Broad Support for Dems' Iraq Plan?
- Obama pays parking tickets...only took him 17 years
- Kohl pushes anti-trust issue
- Scooter Libby
- Two Freshmen Learn the Perils of Talking Too Much
- Senate to question Army on Walter Reed
- obama vs. hillary part 2393893
- Arizona's Other Senator Wants to Fix Leaks
- Children's Health Care on Agenda
- Democrats' plan: Meet goals or bring troops home
- Republicans United in Opposition?
- Democrats eye cuts to 2008 Iraq war request
-
▼
March
(57)
1 comment:
Both parties (because I'm not biased) don't understand how money works in real amounts of dollars and cents. If you look at both parties agendas for upcoming or previous elections, when it comes to the tax base they say the same things in two different ways. Usually it says to raise or level off the taxes on the top 2% earners in America. Unfortunatly the only way we will ever have these tax revenue surplus' some time in the next 100 years is if we all say yes raise my taxes, and start honing in on the problems that really face America. Otherwise in 6 years we will go through this same process again.
Post a Comment