This is a class blog for the students of POLSCI 426: Congressional Politics at the University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee.
Bush Asks Congress for Armed Forces Funding Shift
Although the headline emphasizes Bush’s request for a budget revision to shift $3.2 billion from particular defense items into another troop buildup, the real story here is the composition of the appropriations bill Bush wants Congress to approve. During an international flight on March 10th, President Bush signed a letter (likely prepared by his cabinet) beckoning Congress to approve his latest armed forces appropriations bill, which would enable the deployment of 8,200 more troops to Afghanistan and Iraq in addition to his separate planned deployment of 21,000 American soldiers to Iraq. Given that about 47.5% of the requested funds are to fund Iraqi police and security forces to help the Iraqi government be more able to enforce its laws to eventually reduce dependence on American forces, it is likely that a two-thirds supermajority coalition of Republican and Bluedog Democrats will vote in favor of the bill in both chambers. Any revision that passes both the House and the Senate are unlikely to be much different from the original appropriations bill, as the 52% of requested funds going towards combat support troops is necessary to stabilize attacks against coalition forces, and the 0.5% of requested funds going towards reconstruction teams is appropriate for restoring infrastructure damaged in attacks. Therefore, it is safe to say that Bush’s appropriations proposal is a Condorcet winner in both chambers of Congress and will then (obviously) be signed into effect by President Bush.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(218)
-
▼
March
(57)
- Rep. Dingell Balances Interests to Avoid Dingleberry
- karl rove rapping..for real at a fundraiser
- Senate Sets Stage For Iraq Face-Off
- Odds, Ends, and Misc. Things
- Comedian in Chief?
- House Democrats Tout Budget as Deficit-Reducing
- Edwards’s Cancer Has Spread Into One of Her Hips
- Democrats take another step forward in war legisla...
- McGee spends $10,185 to defend seat
- McCain's MySpace Page Hacked
- The March Madness Loophole
- My Fellow Americans: Pls Post a Comment!
- Congress Expands Scope of Inquiries Into Justice D...
- Democrats Pass Iraq Appropriations Bill
- A Brave New World of Political Skulduggery?
- need a partner
- 2008: March Money Madness
- White House issues veto threat on Iraq pullout bill
- "No" votes and not showing up to vote doesn't make...
- Just like a Broadway play, congressional hearings ...
- US legislation could set Iraq pullout date
- Dems Demand more Cash
- Hillary Invokes Proletarian Interests
- Hagel Stays Out of Presidential Race
- partner anyone?
- YouTube Sets Aside 'Channel' for Presidential Cand...
- The New Dean Political Plan
- Emanuel tells freshmen to avoid Stephen Colbert
- Democrat David Obey attacks "idiot liberals"
- Happy "Sunshine Week" Everybody!
- Veto players always get their way
- Legislator's love triangle implodes
- Dems to Russert, Wallace, and Sheiffer: You're on ...
- Dems optimistic about Iraq plan passage
- need a partner?
- Lantos Introduces Iran Sanctions Legislation
- Democrats Look to Scrap Spending Bill Riders
- Pelosi Reveals Who's Who On Global Warming Panel
- Paperless Ballot Ban
- Senators argue about Alberto Gonzales
- Ted Kennedy Talks: Do I Listen??
- Bush Asks Congress for Armed Forces Funding Shift
- Democrats’ Iraq Plan Draws Broad Support, Poll Shows
- House Dems Face Uphill Battle Over Iraq
- It's Like I'm On Crazy Pills or Something!
- Broad Support for Dems' Iraq Plan?
- Obama pays parking tickets...only took him 17 years
- Kohl pushes anti-trust issue
- Scooter Libby
- Two Freshmen Learn the Perils of Talking Too Much
- Senate to question Army on Walter Reed
- obama vs. hillary part 2393893
- Arizona's Other Senator Wants to Fix Leaks
- Children's Health Care on Agenda
- Democrats' plan: Meet goals or bring troops home
- Republicans United in Opposition?
- Democrats eye cuts to 2008 Iraq war request
-
▼
March
(57)
No comments:
Post a Comment