From the news that's fit for print, this article outlines Bush's veto on a bill prohibiting the CIA from interrogation practices such as waterboarding. Pundits can make what they want out of the motives and ramifications, but for the purpose of this class there is some intriguing elements at play. This is Bush's 9th
veto in his career, however the last 8 have come all within the last
year. Obviously, his ideal point as an agenda setter is outside the
tastes of Congress at this moment. However Congress lacks the votes to
override and it seems that with the expansion of executive powers, even
if they didprohibit it the practice would likely still be used. Legicide.
This is a class blog for the students of POLSCI 426: Congressional Politics at the University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(122)
-
▼
March
(33)
- Ermarks or Local Investment
- Bush pressures Congress
- Unforseen Consequences: Pelosi's Worried About Cash
- Presidential and Congressional
- Clinton and her "Revelation"
- Clinton Unveils Plan to Ease Housing Crisis
- Earmarks
- Sensenbrenner gets TOUGH on China
- Local making political ads for unique congress can...
- Eliot Spitzer's successor admits to having affairs
- Congress "disconnected"
- Ok, so I was wrong in my last post about having a ...
- House Passes Surveillance Bill
- Moratorium on State Earmarks Near
- John McCain's inconsistent voting record
- House Creates New Panel On Ethics
- Suicide doctor plans congressional run
- Rep. King comments
- value of presidency
- House lawsuit
- Results From the Illinois 14th
- Bush Vetoed Waterboarding Bill
- the battle over earmarks
- CEOs defend pay
- Response to toy recall
- Consumer Protection Agency
- Democrats Hoping For 60 Senate Seats
- Le Air Force?
- Special Elections Are Special...
- Could Clinton, Obama become a team?
- The Battle Clinton Didn't Expect
- It is going to be very interesting to see who wins...
- More information about the Wiretap Law
-
▼
March
(33)
No comments:
Post a Comment