This is a class blog for the students of POLSCI 426: Congressional Politics at the University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(122)
-
▼
March
(33)
- Ermarks or Local Investment
- Bush pressures Congress
- Unforseen Consequences: Pelosi's Worried About Cash
- Presidential and Congressional
- Clinton and her "Revelation"
- Clinton Unveils Plan to Ease Housing Crisis
- Earmarks
- Sensenbrenner gets TOUGH on China
- Local making political ads for unique congress can...
- Eliot Spitzer's successor admits to having affairs
- Congress "disconnected"
- Ok, so I was wrong in my last post about having a ...
- House Passes Surveillance Bill
- Moratorium on State Earmarks Near
- John McCain's inconsistent voting record
- House Creates New Panel On Ethics
- Suicide doctor plans congressional run
- Rep. King comments
- value of presidency
- House lawsuit
- Results From the Illinois 14th
- Bush Vetoed Waterboarding Bill
- the battle over earmarks
- CEOs defend pay
- Response to toy recall
- Consumer Protection Agency
- Democrats Hoping For 60 Senate Seats
- Le Air Force?
- Special Elections Are Special...
- Could Clinton, Obama become a team?
- The Battle Clinton Didn't Expect
- It is going to be very interesting to see who wins...
- More information about the Wiretap Law
-
▼
March
(33)
1 comment:
Although there seems to be a lot of political debate within the House about this, I think that they have finally come to a reasonable solution. The most interesting part I found about the update on the surveillance law is "establishing a bipartisan commission to examine the activities of intelligence agencies in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks". The House is clearly divided on this (213 to 197), so I find it hard to believe that they will be able to establish a "bipartisan" commission.
Post a Comment