This is a class blog for the students of POLSCI 426: Congressional Politics at the University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee.
Free Trade? At What Cost?
The Chicago Tribune today carried an excellent op-ed piece by William Daley that argues in favor or re-evaluating certain aspects of our current trade policy. With the new Congress controlled by the Democrats (with a base that is heavily controlled by the unions and other anti-free trade groups) it would not be unreasonable to assume that our current trade policies will be certainly reviewed, and quite possibly revised. There are a handful of anti-free trade Republicans who will certainly lend support. This review would be an excellent activity in light of the growing gap between the middle class and the wealthy. What is good for China is probably not in the best interest of the American people (with exceptions), and unless something is done soon, we will have to trade them California to erase our debt.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(218)
-
▼
February
(60)
- A Three Way Split
- Rice: Congress Shouldn't Micromanage War
- Will Gore Run for President after his Oscar Nod?
- Govenors See Influence Wane In Race For Presidency
- CLINTON SEES ROLE FOR HUSBAND
- Supreme Court Possible Veto Actor in Iraq Resolution
- June Vote Set for Ga. Congressional Seat
- Eye to the Telescope.
- Vilsack Out.
- Democratic Senate Majority in Jeopardy?
- Pelosi tattles on Cheney
- Where did the issues go?
- Committee approves 'informed consent' abortion bill
- Committee approves 'informed consent' abortion bill
- McCain wants to overturn Roe v Wade
- The Hot Ticket in Hollywood: An Evening With Obama
- WI student lobbies in Washington for more funding
- Free Trade? At What Cost?
- Senate Gridlocks on Iraq War Resolution
- Senate Belatedly Passes Spending Bill for 2007
- Petri Breaks With GOP on Iraq
- House set to OK tax package worth $1.8B
- Live from MN, it's Al Franken for Senate!
- Senate Coalition Prevents Different Median Vote
- War at Home: Bush and the Debate
- Falwell, Robertson, and Miscellaneous nutjobs
- McCain Tries To Make Amends With Christian Conserv...
- Pact With North Korea Draws Fire From a Wide Range...
- California Senate votes to move presidential prima...
- what life is more important-- a baby or a chicken
- Australian leader: Al-Qaida wants Obama
- States and U.S. at Odds on Aid for Uninsured
- War at Home: In the People’s House
- Former Pentagon official defends report on Iraq, a...
- Congressional Circumvention of Lobbying Laws
- Committee chairman: Homeland protected 'on the cheap
- Advice for Hillary from one of the greatest politi...
- Wait...There was no conclusive link between Osama ...
- Pelosi and the Plane
- To the highest bidder goes the Presidency
- Global warming ethics, pork and profits
- Going the Way of the Buffalo...Social Security
- Run, Al, Run
- Giuliani Announces He's In '08 Presidential Race
- Smoking Ban in Shorewood Defeated
- Bush sends $2.9 trillion plan to Congress
- House to Take Up Iraq Resolution Debate
- Wash. initiative would require married couples to ...
- PA Senator abuses Non-Profit
- A Presidential Also-Ran, Kerry Adjusts to What Pas...
- Groundhog Day
- McCain blasts 'vote of no confidence'
- Senate Hearing on Congressional War Cessation
- Minimum wage bill heads to negotiations
- US Congress debates rebuke Bush on Iraq
- "Duke-stir" Not Sunk Enough...Yet.
- "Duke-stir" Not Sunk Enough...Yet.
- Doyle calls on congress to pass stem cell legislation
- Speaker Pursues military flights
- Biden Unwraps ‘08 Bid With an Oops!
-
▼
February
(60)
4 comments:
I'd say its about time that the business community showed some sort of concern for the negatives associated with globalization, but until they begin to suffer financially from these negatives, their is no reason for them to do so.
Nevertheless, its depressing to know that our Congressional policies concerning globalization are shaped by the very perpetuant of all its negative qualities.
China needs to let their currency be free-floating. In the long-term the only way to create currency stability is to fix it totally or let it be free-floating. A one-time change once in a while causes much speculation. Without flexibility, speculative flows could quickly become large, as they did during the Asian financial crisis, and threaten economic stability and orderly world trade. (Sorry about theecon talk, that's my thing)
The government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
-Ronald Reagan
The effects of globalization are complex, and have been a kind of mixed bag for Americans. People are offered commodities at cheaper prices but at the same time, manufacturing jobs have relocated and wages are not increasing substabtially for many individuals. I think the author makes a good point that Democrats and the business community needs to look at possible plans to benefit Americans and still conduct international trade.
Post a Comment