This is a class blog for the students of POLSCI 426: Congressional Politics at the University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee.
Senate Gridlocks on Iraq War Resolution
It's amazing how heated a debate this non-binding resolution is. The goal for the Democrats may be to win Foreign relations as a democrat valence issue. The republicans are not looking too hot right now. To top that, Democratic legislation to guarentee minimum protection for soldiers will surely make Bush's job more difficult ($ per soldier will go up), and will be popular with voters. Republicans are preparing to debate against it, that is going to prove to be a tough job.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(218)
-
▼
February
(60)
- A Three Way Split
- Rice: Congress Shouldn't Micromanage War
- Will Gore Run for President after his Oscar Nod?
- Govenors See Influence Wane In Race For Presidency
- CLINTON SEES ROLE FOR HUSBAND
- Supreme Court Possible Veto Actor in Iraq Resolution
- June Vote Set for Ga. Congressional Seat
- Eye to the Telescope.
- Vilsack Out.
- Democratic Senate Majority in Jeopardy?
- Pelosi tattles on Cheney
- Where did the issues go?
- Committee approves 'informed consent' abortion bill
- Committee approves 'informed consent' abortion bill
- McCain wants to overturn Roe v Wade
- The Hot Ticket in Hollywood: An Evening With Obama
- WI student lobbies in Washington for more funding
- Free Trade? At What Cost?
- Senate Gridlocks on Iraq War Resolution
- Senate Belatedly Passes Spending Bill for 2007
- Petri Breaks With GOP on Iraq
- House set to OK tax package worth $1.8B
- Live from MN, it's Al Franken for Senate!
- Senate Coalition Prevents Different Median Vote
- War at Home: Bush and the Debate
- Falwell, Robertson, and Miscellaneous nutjobs
- McCain Tries To Make Amends With Christian Conserv...
- Pact With North Korea Draws Fire From a Wide Range...
- California Senate votes to move presidential prima...
- what life is more important-- a baby or a chicken
- Australian leader: Al-Qaida wants Obama
- States and U.S. at Odds on Aid for Uninsured
- War at Home: In the People’s House
- Former Pentagon official defends report on Iraq, a...
- Congressional Circumvention of Lobbying Laws
- Committee chairman: Homeland protected 'on the cheap
- Advice for Hillary from one of the greatest politi...
- Wait...There was no conclusive link between Osama ...
- Pelosi and the Plane
- To the highest bidder goes the Presidency
- Global warming ethics, pork and profits
- Going the Way of the Buffalo...Social Security
- Run, Al, Run
- Giuliani Announces He's In '08 Presidential Race
- Smoking Ban in Shorewood Defeated
- Bush sends $2.9 trillion plan to Congress
- House to Take Up Iraq Resolution Debate
- Wash. initiative would require married couples to ...
- PA Senator abuses Non-Profit
- A Presidential Also-Ran, Kerry Adjusts to What Pas...
- Groundhog Day
- McCain blasts 'vote of no confidence'
- Senate Hearing on Congressional War Cessation
- Minimum wage bill heads to negotiations
- US Congress debates rebuke Bush on Iraq
- "Duke-stir" Not Sunk Enough...Yet.
- "Duke-stir" Not Sunk Enough...Yet.
- Doyle calls on congress to pass stem cell legislation
- Speaker Pursues military flights
- Biden Unwraps ‘08 Bid With an Oops!
-
▼
February
(60)
2 comments:
This is a damned if you do and damned if you don't proposition. I would hate to be a US Senator having to vote on this for sure, especially as a Republican with strong isolationist tendencies but who also believes in a strong military.
I hope that the House and Senate don't just hand over the 93 billion dollars they want. They need to ask questions like: Where is it going? What will it be used for? And then decide if that is the ideal amount of money needed for their current situation.
Post a Comment