In the library trying to eek out some last minute bloggin! Special Elections!? Mississippi?! Democrats are trying to hold on to a southern seat in this special election set for next Tuesday. Can the Republican's link incumbent Travis Chider to the godless democrat demigods John Kerry and Barak Obama? The electoral history shows that Chiders is looking a little marginal and could be thrown out with the rest of the bums. If the Republicans can exploit this link it may stop the perceived hemorrhaging in the house they've been taking since 2006. The strategy worked slightly in last week's Louisiana congressional election, but Dem. Don Cazayoux still won the traditionally conservative seat. In other news, who's ready to do some quadratic utility function on multi-preferential congressional voting behavior tomorrow at 7:30am?!
Also, when will Barak Obama be added to electronic spell checkers???
Another Housing Thing
According to the New York Times, it seems that many of the reasons that Congress hasn't passed a bill to put a stop to predatory lending can be traced to one Republican senator: Richard C. Shelby. Of course, he says that the fact that his legislation favors the banks who gave him a $5 million dollar loan is just him doing his duty and has nothing to do with his Congressional duties. He states that he just believes in the free market's, saying that it will work, "but not without some pain."
Funny how one man can affect the lives of so many people. Unfortuneately, the Democrats seem to need him to get things done. Senator Dodd stated, "'..Once he makes the deal, it happens.'"
Funny how one man can affect the lives of so many people. Unfortuneately, the Democrats seem to need him to get things done. Senator Dodd stated, "'..Once he makes the deal, it happens.'"
House Scandal
Rep. Vito Fossella (R-NY) was arrested last week for drunk driving. Many members of Congress have been supportive, despite the fact that Fossella's political future in the House is uncertain. Its encouraging to members of Congress reaching out to a fellow representative and showing support despite the cirsumstances. Fossella has been in the House since 1997, but who know what this could do to his political career.
Fiscal Pressures Lead Some States to Free Inmates Early
The idea of releasing inmates on the fact that it could save money somewhat aggrevates my mind. To know that these criminals are being released and not serving the full sentence they are given is mind boggling. What if these criminals that are released convict another crime? They are back in the same place they were before, which is using the same amount of money. To me, being released early seems more like a slap on the hand than anything else.
Voting Rights in the Supreme Court
Interesting piece from Slate.com about the recent Supreme Court decision upholding an Indiana voter ID law...which the author sees as potentially in violation of poll-tax requirements forbidden by the 24th Amendment. I'm not going to claim to have personally reviewed the decision itself or anything, but the Court apparently didn't address the 24th at all, thus "utterly failed to address the most obviously relevant provision of the constitutional text". And that's kind of weird I think.
Louisiana Special Election
The Democrats picked up another seat in the House over the weekend, winning one of the two special elections for vacated GOP seats in Lousiana (a Republican held onto the other seat). Apparently there is another seat in Mississippi vacated by a Republican that will be up next weekend. Democrats and Obama focused on the win as a sign that the party's fractured presidential campaign season has not weakened their electoral strength overall.
Farm Bill
According to the Journal Sentinel, apparently the Farm Bill is merely another bill that looks like it will fix something, but has no real improvements. Apparently other members of Congress who represented the big growers of commodities such as corn, wheat, and sugar. So it looks like this bill that promised to help poor farmers and end the privileges to big ones will mostly promote the status quo. Oh, and it allegedly does nothing about the high cost of grain due to the ethanol craze. So more of the same: poor eating habits, the high cost of food, and small family farms will feel the pain.
House Judiciary: Bringin' The Heat
The Democratically controlled House Judiciary Committee is threatening to subpoena White House strategist Karl Rove. This is nothing out of the ordinary, but what is curious to me is that the article states that the committee is also in the process of suing the former Bush Chief of Staff, Josh Bolten, over his role in the firings of US Attorneys last year. I didn't know that they could do that...
Ethanol, not so good...
It has been known for a while that the use of ethanol in cars is far less efficient than gasoline. Engines need to burn more ethanol to produce the same amount of power as gasoline. Congress has just realized this and is moving to cut back subsidies. The subsidies were originally given so that as consumers we could rely on the production of alternate fuels and not the Middle East. Sounds like a good idea, unfortunately it did not work out so well. Food and fuel prices continue to climb. So congress is now looking for other solutions. The subsidy cuts are planned to be added to the Farm Bill that has yet to pass.
Student loan bill advances, Bush will sign
With all of us in school we all depend on student loans to help us get through the year. This year there was a threat going around that there wasn't going to be enough money for student loans compared to what we are used to. The senate today just passed a bill that will allow more money to be used with the Student Loan program. This bill is going to be head to the President who supports the bill and will sign the bill.
Recovery Rebates
Just an update that this week 7.7 million Americans will receive their Recovery Rebates from the law that legislation signed into in February.
Bush vs. Congress Game 5
Highlighting the ease of exposure the executive gets; President Bush is all the buzz during this lunch hour at the moment. His Rose Garden press conference was used to scold congress and their lack of cooperation on his economic agenda. The President has an audience nearly every time he speaks (Unlike MCs); unless its his weekly radio show, has anyone every tuned into that?? Anyway, Speaker Pelosi threw some sophisticad voting at the President adding that his threat to veto the Democratic Energy Bill is the reason why the House Dems won't play ball. Salient issues. Niice.
London's "Postmodern" Mayoral Election
Obviously not a story about the US Congress, or even directly about the US at all, but I still thought it was an interesting read on a heavily candidate-centered campaign in London and how such a candidate heavy and issue weak campaign is echoed at least somewhat in the Democratic presidential primary.
Obama Winning Senate Endorsements
Obama is now ahead of Clinton with Senate endorsements. He has 14, Sen. Jeff Bingaman (D-NM) put him in the lead, while Clinton only has 13 still.
Senate may consider unequal pay bill
The senate is looking at passing a bill that would allow individuals who feel they have been discriminated against their company in pay compared to other co-workers who do the same job, sue that company. This would overturn a ruling by the Supreme Court in which a female tried suing Good Year tire company however, the Supreme Court ruled she filed to late. Democrats are in favor of the policy however republicans state it would develop to many cases in the court system.
Loopholes in Ethics Law? Nooo....
While it is impossible to form any kind of campaign/lobbyist law that is perfect in preventing their "undue influence" (the New York Times words, not mine) on members of Congress, it can definitely still be fun to look at the flaws and loopholes later and criticize them. In this case the 2007 Honest Leadership and Open Government act has created a few - former Senator John Breaux notes that it is not legal for him to buy a $20 meal for an old friend, but he is allowed to give a $1000 campaign contribution, and members and/or staff can accept cups of coffee but not hot dogs...depending on the occasion. Personally I think that certain restrictions on lobbyists are a good thing, but everybody should always be able to accept a hot dog. That's just un-American.
Congress takes on Credit Cards
Congressional lawmakers are seeking to reform practices used by credit card companies. The House committee on Financial Services has been pressured by consumer interests groups to examine the problem of credit card debt in American families. This seems to be a Democratic effort; the article is sans any Republican quotes. The committee itself is chaired by a Democrat, and has a likewise majority. Notable members of an otherwise un-notable committee; Ron Paul of Texas, and Gwen Moore of our very own Wisconsin.
Senate to investigate House??
Liberal Senators are asking that the Justice Department launch an investigation on the legality of an earmark placed on a 2005 highway funding bill. The initial earmark was approved for $10million to make improvements on Florida's I-75, but was altered just before the bill reached the President for signing. A problem arises with how the Senate can go about with the investigation. Conservatives say that the Justice Department does not have to launch an investigation if directed by the Senate, and they propose that a Committee to be formed for the investigation. Liberals say that it is unconstitutional for the Senate to investigate the House.
Little will probably occur in response to this finding. It sounds like to me that Senators are riding the wave of earmark abuse. If they show they are trying to limit pork barrel spending, maybe it will give them a boost for November elections.
Little will probably occur in response to this finding. It sounds like to me that Senators are riding the wave of earmark abuse. If they show they are trying to limit pork barrel spending, maybe it will give them a boost for November elections.
Robert Byrd Tells Everyone To Shut Up
This one is even about committees...specifically the Senate Appropriations Committee, of which Robert Byrd is the chair. Byrd is 90 years old and the longest serving Senator in history, AND third in line to the presidency (and people think McCain is old). Anyway an interesting article about, well, certainly seniority if nothing else.
Airline Passenger Bill of Rights Could Get Boost From New Travel Woes
The new airline bill gives individuals on planes who have been either cancelled or delayed more rights. If the plane is grounded with the passengers on it for more three hours it allows the passengers to leave if they would like to. It also gives the air plane companies the responsibility to make sure the passengers of the stranded air lines get the proper food, water, and bath room facilities. I personally find it funny that we have individuals dieing in Iraq, and other big concerns. However our wonderful public and congress is more concerned with a convenience problem.
Clinton telling Bush he should skip the Olympic opening ceremonies
In CNN this week Monday, Senator Hillary Clinton called President Bush to boycott the opening of this summer's Olympic Games in China, in regards to the Chinese government's failure to pressure the government of Sudan to end the violence in Darfur. Why do we have to create a huge controversy over something people enjoy to watch?
However, Senator Barack Obama has two views to this issue, he feels that what is happening in Darfur is a problem, but he also feels that having the Olympics is about bringing everyone around the world together, and shouldn't be about a place to voice your opinions about politics. I definately feel the same way as Senator Obama, the Olympics is a gathering of the world and friendly competition. Families all around the world watch the Olympics and they should not have to decide whether or not to watch because the fear of watching political protest as the gymnastics portion of the Olympics is going on.
However, Senator Barack Obama has two views to this issue, he feels that what is happening in Darfur is a problem, but he also feels that having the Olympics is about bringing everyone around the world together, and shouldn't be about a place to voice your opinions about politics. I definately feel the same way as Senator Obama, the Olympics is a gathering of the world and friendly competition. Families all around the world watch the Olympics and they should not have to decide whether or not to watch because the fear of watching political protest as the gymnastics portion of the Olympics is going on.
Bush, Pelosi, and the Colombia Free Trade Agreement
Pelosi blocked a vote on the Colombia Free Trade Agreement today. She stated that Congress is still considering bringing the trade agreement to the floor. Pelosi discussed that it is more important to focus on our country's worsening economy right now. With Bush's presidency coming to an end shortly, I think that he is focusing too much on other countries. After all he is the president of the United States, and I agree with Pelosi that he should be focusing more on our current economic situation, instead of adding more complications.
$$$$
I just think it's kind of ironic that we went in and told them they had to change and now we're telling them they have to finance it.
A Few Things In Politics
Well, it looks like the Presidential candidates will have the opportunity to audition for the role of commander in chief as they question General Petraeus in the hearings on the progress-or lack of it-in Iraq. Of course, looking too tough or too soft on the general will be damaging politically, especially with the Democratic Primary in Pennsylvania fast approaching, thank goodness. I think everyone is sick of the increasingly bitter fights between candidates.
Meanwhile, it seems Congress has given the Department of Homeland Security the power to bypass practically all the environmental laws in order to build the border fence to protect us and "secure our borders". I suppose Congress wants to look like it's doing something to protect us against a faceless enemy. And as usual, someone has to be the scapegoat.
Meanwhile, it seems Congress has given the Department of Homeland Security the power to bypass practically all the environmental laws in order to build the border fence to protect us and "secure our borders". I suppose Congress wants to look like it's doing something to protect us against a faceless enemy. And as usual, someone has to be the scapegoat.
Senate passes bill to help housing crisis
Thursday the Senate passed a package of tax breaks and other steps designed to help business and homeowners deal with the housing crisis. However even the supporters of the bill recognize that is geared more to help businesses such as home builders and doesn’t help the borrowers. It is planned that when it reaches the House of Representatives that it will be redrawn. The White House it has also been said doesn’t approve of the bill. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said this of the bill, “This is just the beginning of the process. This bill will go to the House. With the House and the White House we can come up with a piece of legislation fairly quickly”.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24050189/
House denies Bush vote on Free Trade Agreement
On Thursday the House of Representatives denied President Bush a vote on his proposal for a free trade agreement with
Frustrated Senators See No Exit Signs
It seems to me the frustration that many citizens are feeling about the Iraq war has finally become a frustration in Washington. The senate received a report from ranking military officials about the progress in Iraq. With no end in sight it will be interesting to see how congress responds. If the congressmen are getting frustrated, I don't see why they shouldn't put their foot down and tell the white house to start to bring some troops home. However the future of Iraq will probably not be decided until the next president steps in.
Pelosi to Block Vote on Colombia
Negative agenda power and endogenous institutions all in one post. Enjoy.
Mr. Petraeus goes to Washington
As Shaley Shale, our prophet and guide, mentioned in class today General Petraeus is briefing congress on the fragile state of affairs in Iraq currently. The general believes that after the 20k troop surge ends, troop levels should stay level in Iraq until further notice. Chairman Sen. Carl Levin (D) of Michigan, voiced the trite statement of discontent with the current situation; his sentiment will most likely be repeated by fellow democrats and defecting republicans. It's intersting to see the distance that many former supporters are developing now that the war is unpopular accross the board. My question is, why didn't more Congressman and Senators realize that this would happen in the first place, that they would ultimately need to back down from their support? We talk about sophisticated and strategic voting, where was that in the vote to go to Iraq? Was it done in the votes leading up to it, such as the mentioned Kerry statement: I voted against it before I voted for it (?) Many questions over such a thing I have...
Protecting the Border
Congress granted Michael Chertoff, homeland security secretary, the right to ignore any laws that could get in the way of building a fence to protect the border. Chertoff waived more than 30 laws including ones protecting the environment and endangered species because they interfered with the fence. There seems to be a heated debate arising over Congress’ decision. Many people are claiming that it is unconstitutional for Chertoff to be granted the right to ignore any laws that get in the way of protecting the border. Environmental groups, such as the Sierra Club and Defenders of Wildlife, have also complained, and sued Chertoff last year over his decision to ignore 19 laws interfering with the border. Personally, I am going to have to side with Congress on this one. Although it is important to keep our environment safe and protect endangered species, I think it is more important to protect our country. Illegal immigration needs to be stopped, and if the only way to do it is to allow Chertoff the power to suspend laws interfering with the border fence, then I think that is what must be done.
libertarian candidate
I just thought this might make an interesting twist. Adding a third party could really have a huge effect on the race, as far as drawing from one candidate or another. Libertarian is especially interesting because while at first I want to say he's going to draw from the right, there are probably a few issues where libertarians and the left might agree as well. Libertarian isnt necessarily a popular party, but we've seen other candidates formerly in major parties who maintain their following even after they switch parties.
Al Qaeda No. 2: We don't kill innocents
This was an interesting article to me because as I read it, Al-Zawahiri, the second-in command of al Qaeda stated that they do not kill innocent people in their attacks. Only if they are were killed as a result of "unintentional error" or being used as "human shields."
Why I find this interesting is how do they know which people are innocent or not. Beside from the fact of woman and children. But, when they blow up a building, there are innocent civilians occupying that building, and not just men. Word has it that Osama bin Laden is also "healthy," and even if he "doesn't become ill, he must die one day." Thanks, I feel so relieved now.
Why I find this interesting is how do they know which people are innocent or not. Beside from the fact of woman and children. But, when they blow up a building, there are innocent civilians occupying that building, and not just men. Word has it that Osama bin Laden is also "healthy," and even if he "doesn't become ill, he must die one day." Thanks, I feel so relieved now.
Idaho Senate Race
Idaho is apparently more interesting than I would have guessed, as some interesting characters have cropped up in the race to replace disgraced (Is that the right word? Probably not, let's say "conflicted") soon-to-be-former Senator Larry Craig. The race includes one candidate who entered the primary having never been to Idaho, and another candidate, a strawberry farmer, who has legally changed his name to "Pro-Life" so that the state would have to include his name on the ballot that way. Here's a link to the official Idaho State list of candidates - http://www.idsos.state.id.us/elect/candidat/08candpri.pdf
Housing Bill Moves Forward in Senate
Today the Senate agreed to move forward on a housing bill in an attempt to save the falling house market. Many people have been losing their homes due to the inability to afford their mortgage. The bill has been stalled in the senate because Democrat and Republican Senators can not agree on how best to solve the problem. It seems the only thing they agree on is that something has to be done sooner, rather than later. The bill put forward by the Democrat party had been threatened to be voted down by Senate Republicans until certain Republican Amendments made the agenda.
The bill was originally introduced on the 13th of February and now may be close to receive a vote.
The bill was originally introduced on the 13th of February and now may be close to receive a vote.
Ermarks or Local Investment
This article talks about the diffences between the members of Wisconsin's Congressional delegation. Now three of you congressional delagates including democrats Rep. Ron Kind, La Crosse, and Sen. Feingold say that they will not request any funding for special projects for this budget cycle. Both are makeing claims that any special funding is wastefull citing the hundreds of millions of dollars proposed for the bridge to nowhere. The article goes on to talk about three of the other members of your congressional delegation, Sen. Herb Kohl, who is on the senate Appropreations Committee, Rep. Obey, the chair of the House Appropreations Committee, and Rep. Kagen of Appleton, all democrats. These members of the delagtion do not agree with Sen. Feingold or Rep. Kind and claim that these special funding projects are more then just ermarks but are a way to invest money for local projects that will inturn help the people your receive this money. For example, Rep Kagen cites money he helped the people of Pestigo get to help them clean up the cities water supply. What it all comes down to is what do the voters think. Rep. Kind and Sen. Feingold think that the voters dont want wasteful govt spending and that if the fight ermarks that that might get them so affection from the voters. While Sen. Kohl and Representitves Obey and Kagen think that the voters of their districts would rather get federal money to help with local problems.
Bush pressures Congress
Just a quick note on what items are being discussed this week in Congress. Bush's items of importance include reform of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, to update the Federal Housing Administration, and a free trade agreement with Colombia.
The most interesting of the items seemed to be the Federal Housing Administration (FHA). It appears that Bush is concerned about Americans being able to stay in their homes, and that Congress needs to "modernize" the FHA to help people out. I haven't heard much about this yet, but it will be interesting to see what progress Congress will make on this issue, and if it'll be too late for many Americans to stay in their homes.
The most interesting of the items seemed to be the Federal Housing Administration (FHA). It appears that Bush is concerned about Americans being able to stay in their homes, and that Congress needs to "modernize" the FHA to help people out. I haven't heard much about this yet, but it will be interesting to see what progress Congress will make on this issue, and if it'll be too late for many Americans to stay in their homes.
Unforseen Consequences: Pelosi's Worried About Cash
There's nothing more entertaining than seeing Democrats fight Democrats.
It seems as though the party apparatus of the Democrats is growing a bit antsy with this year's presidential race. Howard Dean warned the candidates earlier on this week, now, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) is worried about how the heated race for the Democratic presidential nominee may hurt Democratic candidates for congress.
In a direct mail piece launched by the DCCC [Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee], Speaker Pelosi urges donors not to let the presidential nomination race hurt congressional candidates. Pelosi's plea comes after she received letters from top Clinton donors lambasting her for comments made regarding super-delegates role in the nomination process.
The events of the past week are only more evidence as to why this race is not going to, at least not on the face, strengthen the Democrats. We seem to hear from party insiders and politicos that this will only energize votes from the left, but as we can see there are some unforseen consequences of these 'intra-party' battles.
At least Republicans acknowledged the fact that a long, arduous nomination race would do damage to the party, and possibly lead to lower turnout.
It seems as though the party apparatus of the Democrats is growing a bit antsy with this year's presidential race. Howard Dean warned the candidates earlier on this week, now, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) is worried about how the heated race for the Democratic presidential nominee may hurt Democratic candidates for congress.
In a direct mail piece launched by the DCCC [Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee], Speaker Pelosi urges donors not to let the presidential nomination race hurt congressional candidates. Pelosi's plea comes after she received letters from top Clinton donors lambasting her for comments made regarding super-delegates role in the nomination process.
The events of the past week are only more evidence as to why this race is not going to, at least not on the face, strengthen the Democrats. We seem to hear from party insiders and politicos that this will only energize votes from the left, but as we can see there are some unforseen consequences of these 'intra-party' battles.
At least Republicans acknowledged the fact that a long, arduous nomination race would do damage to the party, and possibly lead to lower turnout.
Presidential and Congressional
I know I should mention Congressional news, but I just couldn't resist. Clinton's camp seems to be getting very desperate, and Obama seems to be looking better. I (and it seems everyone else) expected Obama to disown his pastor for his remarks, but he came through the controversy almost flawlessly, with an incredible speech that was praised by pretty much everyone. Personally, I hope they'll both be on the ticket after the nomination fight is finally over.
So in Congressional news, I find it a little frustrating with all these scandals surrounding infidelity. I'm not in any way encouraging people to cheat on their spouses, but I think that there are better reasons for a politician to resign. After all, if a someone does that but still a good politican who does what is best for the people he represents, then I think he should be allowed to remain. You think that after everything that Bush and his ilk have put this country through, people would be able to keep things in perspective.
So in Congressional news, I find it a little frustrating with all these scandals surrounding infidelity. I'm not in any way encouraging people to cheat on their spouses, but I think that there are better reasons for a politician to resign. After all, if a someone does that but still a good politican who does what is best for the people he represents, then I think he should be allowed to remain. You think that after everything that Bush and his ilk have put this country through, people would be able to keep things in perspective.
Clinton and her "Revelation"
Its funny how Senator Clinton just realizes that she made a mistake about her trip to Bosnia in claiming how she was under sniper fire back in 1996, but as the video was shown on CNN last night, she was shaking hands with the people of Bosnia happily smiling. I feel that something like that shouldn't be taken lightly. While watching CNN last night, the commentator said she "lied" about her trip. Talk about putting your foot in your mouth.
Clinton Unveils Plan to Ease Housing Crisis
I find it funny how it seems like the government continues to put out more and more money. The fact that the federal deficit keeps getting larger and larger and yet it seems like no one in Washington has taken any notice to this. We always here that there needs to be more money in Washington to get the job done however I believe there are many areas where the government could be taking money away from. For example why are we spending so much money on foreign countries when we don't have enough money to get the jobs done that are needed inside our own borders. Cut some of the funding and bring that money home. The other thing that I have never quite understood is why do we allow the federal deficit to continue to rise. The last number that I heard and this was from 3-4 years ago, but the interest that we spend on the federal deficit is about 14% of the total annual income of the federal government. How about finding ways to pay off the deficit and get that 14% back to use in other areas of need.
Earmarks
The Chronicle of Higher Education published an article about the record number of earmarks members of Congress are granting to colleges/universities. This year alone, 2,306 earmarks were given to 920 institutions. Most of the earmarks were directed towards scientific research at the institutions. An interesting fact in this article is the earmarked money for colleges of Clinton, Obama, and McCain. Clinton has had 21 earmarks, Obama 10 earmarks, and McCain no earmarks. Although this may not be a key issue, I think that it shows how important they think academic research is for the U.S.
Sensenbrenner gets TOUGH on China
While in India, Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner (R) criticized China over their handling of the Tibetan protests that have been catching international attention lately. Sensenbrenner met with the Dalai Lama over the weekend which most likely prompted his criticisms.
I generally feel that it is laughable for an individual congress member
attempt to shape foreign policy, his reason for being in South Asia is quite cool and uncharacteristic of his republican roots and district; an international congressional
delegation on global warming. It's a joint delegation with the UK and
India, in which Sensenbrenner is the most senior Republican on board. Being orginally from Sensenbrenner's district, I can't ever remember global warming being a political topic that concerned Waukesha republicans. Either Sensenbrenner is acting like a trustee or there has been a shift in political perception out there in the 'Sha.
I generally feel that it is laughable for an individual congress member
attempt to shape foreign policy, his reason for being in South Asia is quite cool and uncharacteristic of his republican roots and district; an international congressional
delegation on global warming. It's a joint delegation with the UK and
India, in which Sensenbrenner is the most senior Republican on board. Being orginally from Sensenbrenner's district, I can't ever remember global warming being a political topic that concerned Waukesha republicans. Either Sensenbrenner is acting like a trustee or there has been a shift in political perception out there in the 'Sha.
Local making political ads for unique congress candidates
mFrom the suggestions of both Shelly and Naomi, here's an interesting story about a local man from Milwaukee making some interesting political ads (rather: some ads about interesting candidates).
Here's the Youtube link to some of the ads:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2UesvrH-cs&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QFX1TCK_PS8&feature=related
I'd have a beer with him.
Here's the Youtube link to some of the ads:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2UesvrH-cs&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QFX1TCK_PS8&feature=related
I'd have a beer with him.
Eliot Spitzer's successor admits to having affairs
As I have mentioned in the "Suicide doctor plans congressional run" Eliot Spitzer's successor, David Paterson has admitted to having an affair. Both he and his wife had affairs during their time of marriage while it was headed for divorce. Mrs. Paterson says, "A marriage has peaks and valleys... no marriage is perfect. I think we have a marriage like many Americans. Elected officials are really just reflections of the people we represent." I feel that is right, no marriage is perfect, and for her to admit that and stay by her husband's side is admirable.
Congress "disconnected"
Senate voted on Thursday on a bill to put a ban on earmarks. The bill was voted down 71-29. The article is about how John McCain commented that congress was acting against the will of the people and stressed that pork-barrel spending was out of control. Senator McCain has never asked for earmarks while the article gives the numbers on how much both Senators Clinton and Obama have received. McCain asks that the senators who have received earmarks to give all unused money for their projects to be returned.
Ok, so I was wrong in my last post about having a final winner for the Democratic Presidential nomination. I should have known that we would have to listen to this for awhile yet. Sigh. Oh well.
At least the House of Representatives is defying the Administration and refusing to give immunity to communications companies. And naturally all the major Democratic candidates are behind it. Some good news, even if all o fit seems to be mostly for image's sake. Now we'll see if it can pass in the more conservative Senate.
And it also seems like they're going to retire Bush's tax cuts. Maybe we won't have another Great Depression after all; I'm hoping this is one of those things the media is exaggerating.
At least the House of Representatives is defying the Administration and refusing to give immunity to communications companies. And naturally all the major Democratic candidates are behind it. Some good news, even if all o fit seems to be mostly for image's sake. Now we'll see if it can pass in the more conservative Senate.
And it also seems like they're going to retire Bush's tax cuts. Maybe we won't have another Great Depression after all; I'm hoping this is one of those things the media is exaggerating.
Moratorium on State Earmarks Near
It appears that earmarks on home state projects may be put on hold for a year. Congress looks to be relatively unified on this one; we see Clinton, Obama, and McCain all throwing their support behind such a bill. (To no one's surprise!) In the House, top Republicans lobbied Speaker Pelosi to emphasis earmarks on the agenda, and it appears she has been considering it. Ah, the power of the agenda setter. However, there is opposition, particularly from Nevada Senator Harry Reid (D). The political pundits at the NY Times see it coming down to a 60 votes in the "Yay" column for it to pass. We'll see...
John McCain's inconsistent voting record
The buzz on the blogs today seems to be about John McCain's voting record, which is singularly distinguished by inconsistency when compared to his peers. It seems whether we see this as a sign of strength ("he's a maverick!") or a sign of weakness ("he's a flip-flopper!") will be an important object for spin in the months ahead.
House Creates New Panel On Ethics
This is something that we have discussed in class...and it has to do with Congress! This new panel is a way of policing Congress instead of just using the "fire alarm" oversight of the House Ethics Committee. I believe this new panel will be a good thing for Congress in terms of, perhaps, raising their low approval ratings. This seems to have been a long time coming. To me, it seems quite stupid to have members of your own legislative body, let alone party, decide who needs to be investigated and for what. I'm sure that many conflicts and behind the scenes deals might be avoided with the creation of this panel. An independent ethics panel may instill a little more trust in Congress by actually looking into things that, as Fred Wertheimer says in this article, get sucked into the black hole of the Ethics Committee.
Suicide doctor plans congressional run
We have spent a lot of time in class talking about how difficult it is for challengers to run against incumbents. I find it interesting that a doctor who has attempted to commit suicide is trying to run for congress. First off he must be having a hard time with his practice for the fact that I can't imagine to many individuals would want a doctor as their doctor who has tried to commit suicide. I think it will be really hard for him to run against an incumbent with that time of status but we will have to see how everything plays out.
Rep. King comments
Rep. King (R-IA) stated yesterday how "happy" terrorists will be if Obama is elected president. This is mostly because the terrorists would view this war on terror as a victory. Obama responded by stating that he feels the opposite way of King's comments, and he feels keeping troops in Iraq (which McCain is suggesting) will have the affect on terrorists that King is suggesting. I do not know if King was right when he said this about Obama, but it definitely makes people question what is going to happen with terrorists if a Democratic president is elected.
value of presidency
I just thought this was interesting because it talks about what we were discussing last week. It's especially interesting that according to these figures, the democratic candidates have raised way more money than McCain. Part of this, of course is that their primary race is more competitive, but it's quite a big difference.
House lawsuit
The House Judiciary Committee filed lawsuits, regarding the firing of 9 U.S. Attorneys, against White House Counsel Harriet Miers and White House Chief of Staff Joshua Bolten. The filing explains how Miers and Bolten refused to appear before the House Judiciary Committee and to provide important documents. It was questionable if Miers and Bolten would be prosecuted for contempt of Congress, but U.S. Attorney General Michael Mukasey said that “the noncompliance by Mr. Bolten and Ms. Miers with the Judiciary Committee subpoenas did not constitute a crime.”
Personally, I think that they did commit a crime. They refused to comply with the House Judiciary Committee. It gives me the impression that when White House staff “commits a crime” they merely get a slap on the wrist. Nancy Pelosi stated in the article also that this decision undermines public confidence in our criminal justice system.
Results From the Illinois 14th
So Democrat Bill Foster has won the vacant seat from Illinois, and Barack Obama is glad because he says it was a strong message from the people of Illinois that they are "ready for change". But I think the other interesting thing about this article has to do with high-quality challengers - apparently the Republican candidate in this election, Jim Oberweis, has now spent nearly $9 million of his own money on 6 different elections in the past 6 years (including attempted runs for U.S. Senate) and STILL does not hold any elective office. Oberweis' had been airing an attack ad blasting his opponent as a tax=and-spender, containing this out-of-context quote from Foster: "There's nothing in life that you can't improve by throwing money at it." Can't wait to see how much money Oberweis throws at his own fall '08 run.
Bush Vetoed Waterboarding Bill
From the news that's fit for print, this article outlines Bush's veto on a bill prohibiting the CIA from interrogation practices such as waterboarding. Pundits can make what they want out of the motives and ramifications, but for the purpose of this class there is some intriguing elements at play. This is Bush's 9th
veto in his career, however the last 8 have come all within the last
year. Obviously, his ideal point as an agenda setter is outside the
tastes of Congress at this moment. However Congress lacks the votes to
override and it seems that with the expansion of executive powers, even
if they didprohibit it the practice would likely still be used. Legicide.
veto in his career, however the last 8 have come all within the last
year. Obviously, his ideal point as an agenda setter is outside the
tastes of Congress at this moment. However Congress lacks the votes to
override and it seems that with the expansion of executive powers, even
if they didprohibit it the practice would likely still be used. Legicide.
the battle over earmarks
I just thought this was interesting considering Bush's promise to veto bills based on number of earmarks. I really didnt think anyone would act on what he said, but apparently it's become a big deal. I almost wonder if the republicans are playing chicken. Perhaps they believe they wont get the majority they need for the moratorium, but they'll look good by trying. Or maybe I'm just cynical.
CEOs defend pay
Today the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee heard testimony from three corporate executives dealing with how they keep reeling in millions of dollars while contributing to the subprime mortgage crisis that has their companies losing hundreds of millions of dollars. The CEOs brought in were Angelo Mozilo of Countrywide Financial Corp.; Stanley O'Neal, formerly of Merrill Lynch & Co; and Charles Prince, formerly of Citigroup Inc.. Mozilo argued that “As our company did well, I did well, but when our company did not do well, as in 2007, my direct compensation and the value of my holdings declined materially, which is as it should be”. The problem that he is not seeing though is that even when his company has a down year he is still making around seven figures probably. For instance Mozilo’s company lost 1.2 billion in the third quarter of 2007 then proceeded to lose another 422 million in the 4th quarter. Yet with all of this he still earned a 1.9 million dollar salary, $20 million in stock awards, and then sold another $121 million in stock. While its obvious a CEO of a fortune 500 company is going to make a very large amount of money, they shouldn’t be getting rewarded, especially when their companies are contributing to the
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/07/AR2008030700390.html
Response to toy recall
On Thursday the Senate passed legislation that would toughen inspections of toys and other child playthings that are made out of the
Consumer Protection Agency
On Thursday the Senate voted to greatly increase the resources of the Consumer Protection Agency in response to multiple findings of tainted children's toys and pet foods this past year. Toys manufactured in China were recalled after they were discovered to contain dangerous amounts of lead paint. Moreover, the article describes many other incidents that lead to the need to increase the CPA's resources. The Senate overwhelmingly passed the bill and is now waiting for the House to do the same. If the bill passes both the House and Senate there is concern of a Presidential veto because it has not received backing from the White House, however, something needs to be done in this case because, "In November, shipments of the popular toy Aqua Dots were found to have been contaminated with a toxic chemical that turned into a powerful "date rape" drug if swallowed, causing some children who ate the craft toys to vomit and lose consciousness." It is rather ridiculous that something like this can pass any inspection, but crazier things have happened...
Democrats Hoping For 60 Senate Seats
So the outlook of the vulnerable American politician is apparently that if you are a Senate Democrat up for re-election this year...you may not be that vulnerable; one analyst quoted in the article sees no Senate elections that are potential "toss-ups" or losses for the 12 incumbent Democrats who are up for re-election. Meanwhile the Republicans have several of vulnerable incumbents of the 23 (!) seats, including vacated/retired candidates, that they are defending this fall. 60 may be an unlikely goal but it appears to be within reach.
Le Air Force?
This story is about a recent Air Force decision to award an enormous contract for new Air Refueling Tanker Jet to a European company rather than the American company also competing for the project, Boeing.
The contract in question is worth billions of dollars (35) and countless numbers of factory jobs, so, the politicians indignation is understandable.
However, righteous anger does ring a tad shallow when you consider that, while the Congressman are upset over the loss of American jobs, they're more upset that the jobs lost are jobs from their own District.
What is particularly interesting here is how on one side of the argument, the so-called "losers," Washington state Democrat Patty Murray (Boeing is based in Washington state), rail against the contract going to EADS-Northrup on the grounds of American job security. Murray argues that as a result of the Tanker Contract going to a European company, ultimately, American factory jobs will be lost and the American economy will further be weakened.
On the other side of the argument, Republican Jeff Sessions of Alabama, counters the job loss argument by pointing out all of the new jobs will be created in his home state. "INsourcing?" I didn't know the word even existed.
This is an interesting situation in the fact that's this isn't at all a Partisan issue, it's all economics. On one side, arguing against the Air Force's decision, you've got Democrat Murray and Kansas Republican Roberts, (I wonder if this may be the only issue those two will ever agree on), and on the other is Republican Sessions. This debate is not about Red vs. Blue, this one is all Green.
I found parts of this story to be an enlightening glimpse into some of the inner workings of Congress, especially the bit at the end where we hear about Sen. Sam Brownback (R-Kan.) of the Appropriations Committee considering holding back payment to the Air Force in order to stall the new Tanker Aircraft Contract.
This story recalls earlier class readings where we learned about which powers exactly does Congress have. The reporters note that, while Congress can't explicitly reverse this decision, they can in essence kill the deal by withholding the funding.
Ah, The Power of the Purse.
See also:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=87928796
The contract in question is worth billions of dollars (35) and countless numbers of factory jobs, so, the politicians indignation is understandable.
However, righteous anger does ring a tad shallow when you consider that, while the Congressman are upset over the loss of American jobs, they're more upset that the jobs lost are jobs from their own District.
What is particularly interesting here is how on one side of the argument, the so-called "losers," Washington state Democrat Patty Murray (Boeing is based in Washington state), rail against the contract going to EADS-Northrup on the grounds of American job security. Murray argues that as a result of the Tanker Contract going to a European company, ultimately, American factory jobs will be lost and the American economy will further be weakened.
On the other side of the argument, Republican Jeff Sessions of Alabama, counters the job loss argument by pointing out all of the new jobs will be created in his home state. "INsourcing?" I didn't know the word even existed.
This is an interesting situation in the fact that's this isn't at all a Partisan issue, it's all economics. On one side, arguing against the Air Force's decision, you've got Democrat Murray and Kansas Republican Roberts, (I wonder if this may be the only issue those two will ever agree on), and on the other is Republican Sessions. This debate is not about Red vs. Blue, this one is all Green.
I found parts of this story to be an enlightening glimpse into some of the inner workings of Congress, especially the bit at the end where we hear about Sen. Sam Brownback (R-Kan.) of the Appropriations Committee considering holding back payment to the Air Force in order to stall the new Tanker Aircraft Contract.
This story recalls earlier class readings where we learned about which powers exactly does Congress have. The reporters note that, while Congress can't explicitly reverse this decision, they can in essence kill the deal by withholding the funding.
Ah, The Power of the Purse.
See also:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=87928796
Special Elections Are Special...
...and this one is no different. A special election is to be held Saturday in Illinois to fill the seat of retired former Speaker of the House Denny Hastert. The two challengers for the vacant seat, Bill Foster (D) and James Oberweis (R), are not only in a somewhat suprisingly competitive race to fill the seat for the remainder of the term but will also face off again in the fall, and this near-immediate rematch I think makes it a lot more fun, which is what Denny Hastert is all about. The article notes that the Democrats not only see this as a potentially symbolic seat to take given Hastert's (former) standing in his own party, but also are attempting to take advantage of Obama's popularity by tying their candidate to him, and are spending much more money in a traditionally Republican district that they otherwise may have.
Could Clinton, Obama become a team?
It would be very interesting I would have to say if Obama and Clinton teamed up eventually. I would be interested to see how this would effect both persons ability to get elected. I think we have to keep in mind that this is the first time a female and a minority has gotten this far in a presidential race. The fact that if they both teamed up as one makes me wonder if that would be to much unusual circumstances for some voters and would lead many voters to go vote for a traditional candidate within the Republican party. Time can only tell!!
The Battle Clinton Didn't Expect
On such an important Tuesday for the democratic primaries (some are calling it Super Tuesday II), I thought this was an interesting article. It discusses how different the race would have been had Obama not been a part of it. Hilary's campaign has probably been planned for quite some time and with the entrance of Obama, the article states that she hasn't been able to really catch her breath until the past two weeks. The author brings up an interesting point (actually brought up by a Clinton supporter) when he says that Clinton ran the last campaign of the 20th century and Obama ran the first of the 21st. Tonight's results should be interesting...hopefully they end the suspense.
It is going to be very interesting to see who wins the primaries in Ohio and Texas. Both sides have of course been doing plenty of mud-slinging as the race for who will become the Democratic nominee gets closer and closer. This set of primaries looks like it will settle beyond a doubt as to who will be the winner, bringing an end to a very close race. My projection is that Obama will most likely win. Obviously either nominee will be a historical first if elected, and maybe our next leader will be able to prevent the crisis that the country is stepping towards more and more. All I know is I can't wait until Bush is out of office, and I hope our next leader can dig us out of this hole and help restore our credibility.
Although it will obviously be up to American voters whether they are ready to see a radical departure from the usual people you see in the White House. But I think that if the people would ever do something so unusual, it would be this election, where they obviously want a big change in general after the last eight years. The only reason that someone like Obama has gotten this far is that people don't want another politician: they want someone who will inspire them, give them hope, and bring them together. And Obama is a new face who obviously has the charisma to do so. We'll just have to see what happens in November.
Although it will obviously be up to American voters whether they are ready to see a radical departure from the usual people you see in the White House. But I think that if the people would ever do something so unusual, it would be this election, where they obviously want a big change in general after the last eight years. The only reason that someone like Obama has gotten this far is that people don't want another politician: they want someone who will inspire them, give them hope, and bring them together. And Obama is a new face who obviously has the charisma to do so. We'll just have to see what happens in November.
More information about the Wiretap Law
I wrote a blog a little while back about a surveillance (wiretap) law that had recently expired, and Bush was trying to get the House to renew it. Representative Reyes (D-TX), chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, stated yesterday that the House is moving forward with provisions regarding this bill. Reyes discussed that the bill would protect the phone companies who helped with wiretapping after 9/11. A major concern with the wiretap law is what to do with the phone companies that are already involved in lawsuits for wiretapping. Reyes stated that hopefully by the end of the week they will be able to bring the bill to a vote. It was interesting reading this article because I had previously written a blog about the wiretap bill, but it did not seem like anyone was with Bush for renewing the law. Now, however, it seems as though the House is moving forward with this issue.
weak economy good news for dems??
The November election has many issues for congressional candidates to focus on, this article stresses the importance of the state of the economy. President Bush this morning during a press conferences stated that the economy was in a "slow down" but is not heading towards recession. This has led to believe that voters are going to see this slowdown as a problem brought on by the Republican party and will give Democrats an increased advantage in the House and Senate. We discussed in class how the President has an advantage over Congress in that the Pres. is a much more visual figure, therefore, is much more open to receiving grief/praise. In this case Republicans can potentially lose more seats in Congress because the President is a Republican. People seem to forget that the Democrats have controlled Congress for the past four years. Depending on the state of the economy come November, the GOP may see its numbers dwindle even more.
What's in a name??
On Headline News yesterday night, there was apparently a controversy over Obama's middle name, which is Hussein. Which is the same as Sadam Hussein. Such controversy over a name?? There was also an issue that his name some how rhymed with Osama Bin Ladin's. Now, are we electing him on what his name is or his issues and what he believes in?
Investigation of Clemens Is Sought
Here we are again another case of perjury in the baseball steroid era. Now tell me you couldn't have seen this coming. From the feeling I got out of the article, it sounded like congress was going to push for the Justice Department to conduct an investigation on Clemens for lying under oath even before he testified. The fact of the matter is, I really do not think congress really cares what goes on in baseball and whether or not baseball players are using performance enhancing drugs. Congress in my opinion is really looking at this as a public promotion guide. They are trying "in my opinion" to make it look like congress is tough when it comes to abiding by the rules. I guarantee you that if they had on trial a person that did not have the type of famous reputation as Clemens does, congress would most likely not even look at the person like they were lying while under oath. The fact that congress had to of had in their mind they were going to investigate Clemens even before he took the stands, clearly states to me that Congress is trying to make themselves look like the all and mighty powerful.
energy
I really like the idea of taxing oil and using the money for clean energy. I can see how it isnt really fair to the gas companies, since we're taxing them until we can replace them. It's tricky diplomatically, because we need the oil right now, and this bill clearly threatens the oil market. Putting special taxes on specific imports isnt really a new idea, so I dont see it as discriminatory, but it's a tricky business getting the oil we need now and at the same time becoming less dependant upon it.
GOP Wants DeLay's Old District Back
Well really there are 2 seats in Texas they are investing a lot into getting back, one of them being Tom DeLay's seat. The emphasis on the "symbolic value" of the seats is interesting given that they lost a lot of seats in '06 and I'm sure they'd like them all back, but it's not suprising since DeLay was a pretty big name in the party for awhile. Also the article notes that one of the candidates has been campaigning since early last year, in other words since probably right around the time the new Democratic rep went to work in Washington. Permanaent campaign cycle indeed.
The Russ Belts.
Today we tune in to find one of our very own Senators, Russ Feingold, (D-Wis.) in the national news.
And again he endeavors to torment the Bush White House before their January 20th trip back to Texas, or Kennebunkport, or wherever it is they claim residency.
Feingold, along with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) has proposed a bill that would stop payment for combat operations in Iraq by June.
I chose to highlight this bit of news because it harkens back to our recent reading on Congress and the President, in terms of WHO exactly has WHAT powers regarding the Making of War.
As mentioned in the reading, and as we all know, the President is the "Commander in Chief;" he/she is top leader of the military. Congress controls the military money, and Feingold is making that point very clear with this bill.
In essence, Feingold is telling the President, "show me something (by way of progress in Iraq) or I'm cutting off the cash for your project."
It's worthy of mention that Feingold and the Democrats make absolutely no effort disguise their slim hopes of actually getting this bill passed. They know, and have essentially said as much, that this thing is gonna fly like a lead balloon. (Like a Brett Favre pass on cold January night. In front a nationally televised audience. In overtime. With a shot at the Super Bowl at stake.)
But, feeling that they now hold the stronger hand in this debate, Senate Republicans have called Feingold's bluff and allowed his bill to proceed.
Post-surge Iraq, and Baghdad in particular, looks downright El Doradoian to the Republicans and they want the opportunity to tell Americans that Iraq is gonna be alright.
Who says Politics is boring?
On either side of the aisle, this is a symbolic, strategic, insincere move down to its very core. Looks like somebody's readying some issues to bring home to voters and campaign on.
How Rovian of them.
NOTE: Midway through the report, the radio host mentions a "test vote," on the bill to gauge support for it ahead of time. I'd never heard of that tactic, maybe something for discussion in class.
And, if you'd prefer to read than listen, I've also included here a link to an New York Times print story about the same move by Feingold.
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/02/25/iraq-returns-to-the-stage-in-congress/
Another link:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=17982862
And again he endeavors to torment the Bush White House before their January 20th trip back to Texas, or Kennebunkport, or wherever it is they claim residency.
Feingold, along with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) has proposed a bill that would stop payment for combat operations in Iraq by June.
I chose to highlight this bit of news because it harkens back to our recent reading on Congress and the President, in terms of WHO exactly has WHAT powers regarding the Making of War.
As mentioned in the reading, and as we all know, the President is the "Commander in Chief;" he/she is top leader of the military. Congress controls the military money, and Feingold is making that point very clear with this bill.
In essence, Feingold is telling the President, "show me something (by way of progress in Iraq) or I'm cutting off the cash for your project."
It's worthy of mention that Feingold and the Democrats make absolutely no effort disguise their slim hopes of actually getting this bill passed. They know, and have essentially said as much, that this thing is gonna fly like a lead balloon. (Like a Brett Favre pass on cold January night. In front a nationally televised audience. In overtime. With a shot at the Super Bowl at stake.)
But, feeling that they now hold the stronger hand in this debate, Senate Republicans have called Feingold's bluff and allowed his bill to proceed.
Post-surge Iraq, and Baghdad in particular, looks downright El Doradoian to the Republicans and they want the opportunity to tell Americans that Iraq is gonna be alright.
Who says Politics is boring?
On either side of the aisle, this is a symbolic, strategic, insincere move down to its very core. Looks like somebody's readying some issues to bring home to voters and campaign on.
How Rovian of them.
NOTE: Midway through the report, the radio host mentions a "test vote," on the bill to gauge support for it ahead of time. I'd never heard of that tactic, maybe something for discussion in class.
And, if you'd prefer to read than listen, I've also included here a link to an New York Times print story about the same move by Feingold.
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/02/25/iraq-returns-to-the-stage-in-congress/
Another link:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=17982862
Survelliance Law
Bush asked the House to renew a surveillance law that expired this month. The surveillance law was known as the Protect America Act of 2007; it would also add legal immunity for telephone companies. The main reason why Bush wants to renew this law is due to the lawsuits phone companies such as AT&T, Sprint, & Verizon are facing after turning over phone records without court orders after 9/11. The Senate passed a bill that includes immunity; the House version of the bill does not contain immunity. Two Senators and two Reps. said that Bush is using scare tactics to renew the bill. This is a difficult issue because the phone companies were complying with the government, but at the same time they violated people’s rights. Hopefully in the next few months the Senate and House can work together regarding future surveillance law issues.
You will probably want a donut after you read this
Now this is the kind of campaign investigation that the American people have been clamoring for. I don't really have anything smart to say about it, just thought it was an interesting story about spending that if nothing else highlights the (notsomuch now I guess) hidden costs of running such a large scale campaign. And it contains a concise political insight from a Dunkin' Donuts assistant manager.
Obama not wearing his lapel pin.
I read an article on CNN about Obama not wearing his flag pin on his lapel. Now is that such a big deal to everyone? He states by saying, "My attitude is that I'm less concerned about what you're wearing on your lapel than what's in your heart. And you show your patriotism by how you treat your fellow Americans, especially those who served. You show your patriotism by being true to our values and our ideals and that's what we have to lead with is our values and our ideals." I feel the same way, some of our other Presidntial candidates don't always wear a flag pin either, nor does our own President. So, what's the big deal??
Enter Ralph Nader
To the chagrin of Democrats and delight of Republicans, Ralph Nader has
decided to run for President. Throwing around lines such as "Jeffersonian
Revolution" and "Dissent is the mother of ascent," Nader announced hisc candiacy
on Meet the Press this morning. If I may state my opinion, I am
appalled. In the past few presidential contests,I believe a choice in
the form of Ralph Nader had been necessary, but not
this time. I can't help to believe that Nader is completely senile and
full of self-pride that blinds him to the real political ramifications
his actions have.
decided to run for President. Throwing around lines such as "Jeffersonian
Revolution" and "Dissent is the mother of ascent," Nader announced hisc candiacy
on Meet the Press this morning. If I may state my opinion, I am
appalled. In the past few presidential contests,I believe a choice in
the form of Ralph Nader had been necessary, but not
this time. I can't help to believe that Nader is completely senile and
full of self-pride that blinds him to the real political ramifications
his actions have.
Rep. Rick Renzi
Rep. Renzi, R- Arizona, has been indicted on multiple charges by a federal grand jury. The charges include pressuring landowners into buying a 480-acre parcel which was owned by a previous business partner of his. Needless to say, Renzi has decided not to run for re-election. Its interesting that many times when someone in Congress is involved in a scandle or lawsuit (pretty much anything that could put a damper on their re-election), they decide not to run for re-election. Although this article suggested that Renzi not running for re-election had a lot to do with pressure from the House GOP leaders.
Article with further details on Renzi's charges in case anyone is interested
Article with further details on Renzi's charges in case anyone is interested
Illinois senator garners key demographics
With Obama winning Wisconsin it seems like he is starting to get ahead of Clinton in many areas. The article states that Obama is starting to attract many of the supporters that had been supporting Clinton. Obama has to have a lot of motivation after winning Wisconsin, which many are calling a key state when it comes to November's election.
Illinois senator garners key demographics
With Obama winning Wisconsin it seems like he is starting to get ahead of Clinton in many areas. The article states that Obama is starting to attract many of the supporters that had been supporting Clinton. Obama has to have a lot of motivation after winning Wisconsin, which many are calling a key state when it comes to November's election.
Technology in Congress
About 50 bills regarding technology are on Congress's agenda. The main concern of industry groups is that Congress does not change the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). One bill proposed is the Digital Media Consumers Rights Act. Another bill that may be introduced would not allow people to make or distribute digital media devices unless they have government-approved copy restriction. Another bill that may be introduced is a privacy bill to protect online surfers. There seems to be two overall dominant opinions about the technology bills in this article. First, people like Robert Crestanti (mentioned in the article) view Congress' changing of the DMCA as a threat to their companies. And secondly, members of Congress may have proposed bills, but it doesn't seem like much is going to get accomplished. Senator Ernest Hollings, who may introduce two bills, proposed a bill last year that got lost on the Senate floor. These bills seem to be a somewhat controversial issue between industry groups and Congress.
What's a Superdelegate To Do?
As one colleague pointed out today, maybe calling them supertrustees would have cleared up all of this mess...
Voting Rights
Word has it that Congress wants to pass a law so that convicted felons that have done time are able to vote. That would mean an addtional 40,000 votes by 2010, the thing is that these felons have to have finished their sentence. I'm not really sure how I feel about this topic, given that illegal immigrants aren't able to vote, but from my first post, are eligible for the $600 coming in the mail. Of course this is a good thing for the candidate, but what about the people who can not vote, but would like to.
FISA
I really dont understand why it is so important when exactly this bill expired. I guess there may be specific contested cases, but it definitely feels like someone is spending too much time fussing over the wrong issues. And once they decided exactly when the bill expired, how does that help. It expired at 12 AM on sunday. Is that eastern time? Central? Mountain? Pacific? It doesnt matter how much energy you spend specifying the exact time, there will always be away to get around it for specific controversial cases. Maybe it's just me.
Senators ask Pentagon to investigate delayed Armored Vehicles
Senators Joseph Biden Jr. De-Del and Senator Kit Bond Re-MO are asking the Pentagon to launch an investigation into why a Marine Corps was denied a request by battlefield commanders in 2005 for blast resistant vehicles. The article explains how hundreds of US Marines have been either killed or injured by roadside bombs. Both Senators issued statements on the refusal by bureaucrats to deploy the blast resistant vehicles. The Senators say that the investigation needs to be done to find out why the delay happened and to insure that it never happens again. It seems to be a big deal that a refusal like this would occur when Congress continues to approve additional funding for the war on terrorism. This should never have happend because these blast-resistant vehicles could have saved American lives.
The Stimulus Bill.
This piece is slightly outdated, however, I consider it a very good example of the Median Voter Theory (MVT) that we'd looked at earlier in the semester.
The article deals with the (at the time) differing versions of the Economic Stimulus Package that was developing in Congress.
As the article states, The House of Representatives and The White House crafted a bill that would cost $146 billion. It was then sent over to The Senate who countered with a $158 billion version of their own.
The House and The White House wanted "X," and The Senate wanted "Y." Now it is time for everyone to sit down and hash out the particulars and push the bill through.
Farther down the article is the section headed "What's in the Senate version?" Here we see the specific differences the Senate bill addresses.
I will do some more digging to find an article that illustrates more precisely what the final, agreed upon Stimulus Bill contains.
The article deals with the (at the time) differing versions of the Economic Stimulus Package that was developing in Congress.
As the article states, The House of Representatives and The White House crafted a bill that would cost $146 billion. It was then sent over to The Senate who countered with a $158 billion version of their own.
The House and The White House wanted "X," and The Senate wanted "Y." Now it is time for everyone to sit down and hash out the particulars and push the bill through.
Farther down the article is the section headed "What's in the Senate version?" Here we see the specific differences the Senate bill addresses.
I will do some more digging to find an article that illustrates more precisely what the final, agreed upon Stimulus Bill contains.
Huckabee Takes a Break and Heads to Caymens
It appears that Mike Huckabee is really getting down to grassroots and appealing to his base, by leaving Wisconsin over the weekend and making his way to the Caymen Islands. It's tough for me to figure out how this fits into a Congressional politics class, since Huckabee has never been in Congress... He sites that unlike his rival candidates, he has never recieved a taxpayer based salary that pads the pockets of McCain, Obama, and Clinton. Maybe Congress should look into having publicly funded campagins as they have in Europe... so that sending Congressional outsiders, like Huckabee, overseas can be avoided...?
Bush Scolds Congress Over Expiring Eavesdropping Bill
Some Democrats never learn, just like Bill Clinton, maybe we should just stick our head in the sand and hope nothing happens. It worked for Clinton, afterall he did nothing but small scale strikes that amounted to nothing but distract people from his many affairs. Maybe the Democrats can go back to bullying smaller nations like Serbia, but wait Bush beat him to it today, so I guess they have nothing do do other than make this nation more vunerable to attack. After my people were stabbed in the back again by our "Allies" I don't blame them either.
Wisconsin Primary
I tried to resist the temptation to blog about the upcoming presidential primary, however, the Democratic race is too heated to ignore. The link is from pollster on the support for the Democratic candidates and it is real close. I was only concerned about voting for my alderman during the primary election on Tuesday because it seems that McCain has virtually clinched the Republican nomination. However, to touch on a class related topic, I am now choosing to wake up real early to walk down to Riverside High School to partake in some strategic voting. I understand that the Republican nominee is going to have a difficult election this year, that is why I must do my part to help my party by voting for the Democrat candidate I feel has less chance of succeeding in November. I hope all conservatives in class do the same. =)
Chafee Endorses Obama
Just a short article on a moderate Republican turned Independent endorsing Obama. We discussed Lincoln Chafee in class a couple of weeks ago so I thought this was an interesting article following up on that discussion.
This also made me think about sophisticated voting. Obama seems to be attracting voters from all walks of life, as well as both sides of the scale. No matter who you like, if anyone, on the Democratic side of things...you have to take into account their chances of winning in the general election.
This also made me think about sophisticated voting. Obama seems to be attracting voters from all walks of life, as well as both sides of the scale. No matter who you like, if anyone, on the Democratic side of things...you have to take into account their chances of winning in the general election.
House to Debate Contempt Charges for Bush Advisers
Just another waste of time by the Democratic Congress. As we know U.S. Attorneys serve at the pleasure of the President, who may fire them at any time, for no reason. In fact when Bill Clinton came to office he fired all the US Attorneys, which was he right to do; and there was no investigation. Congress should do some work on the economy, and other more pressing issues like filling judicial vacancies! In fact the Iraqi Congress has gotten more done lately than the US Congress, and even worse Congressional Leaders say the Iraqi Government is a failure. So what should we say about the Reed-Pelosi Congress?
Rebate checks in the mail by spring
As a poor college student I am always happy to hear when the government is handing out free money. I know everyone in America is always happy when the government gives you money and you don't have to give them money. With the recent passing of the legislation to allow rebate checks to go out to Americans, many Americans will be looking forward to this. However, it stated in the article that not everyone will be spending it right away. It stated in this article that in 2001 when rebate checks were sent out not all Americans spent the money right away and it took them 3-4 months to decide what they were actually going to spend it on. I read in another article which I was not able to find again once I was ready to post that many times Americans will use this money to pay bills or to invest in some way. So if Americans are spending it on their daily lives and are really not putting money back into the econmy like the legislation is designed to do, what exactly will our economy get from this. If its anything like the past this will not change our current econmy. Don't get me wrong I am not complaining about free money, but history doesn't seem to be in our favor.
MD Challenger Wins Stunning Victory Over Long-Time Incumbent
We've talked before about the vulnerability that primaries create for incumbents. More evidence that it's true.
Rep. Tom Lantos
Rep. Lantos, a CA Democrat, died earlier today. He was the only Holocaust survivor to serve in Congress. Lantos served on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, and was on his 14th term in Congress. He escaped labor camps twice while Hitler was in power. Last year, Lantos and four other members of Congress were arrested while protesting outside of Sudanese Embassy protesting against the genocide in Darfur. Other accomplishments include founding the Congressional Human Rights Caucus and leading the first congressional delegation to Libya in more than 30 years. Rep. Lantos seemed like he cared very much about Americans freedom as well as the freedom of people in other countries. His work in Congress over the decades shows his dedication towards making sure people today do not have to experience what he did in the labor camps.
WI Votes...February 19th
If you would have asked almost anyone a few months ago whether or not the Wisconsin primary would even matter in deciding the nominations, most people would have said no...including me. I knew the elections (especially the on the Democrat side of things) would be close, but I didn't foresee a virtual tie resulting post-Super Tuesday. This article takes a look at how our state is gearing up for possible record-breaking turn out next Tuesday. Milwaukee has ordered enough ballots to support a 75% turnout and is staffing around 300 more poll workers than normal. These are important preparations because despite Wisconsin's relatively late primary, we have always had a high turnout. This could have something to do with our same day registration. The article also discusses the 50% turnout that set the record for Wisconsin in 1960 when JFK received the nomination. Could this be another 1960?
If anyone has questions about where you vote, how you register or anything like that, I found this website helpful...http://elections.state.wi.us/
If anyone has questions about where you vote, how you register or anything like that, I found this website helpful...http://elections.state.wi.us/
From Bush, Foe of Earmarks, Similar Items
Speaks for itself I think. And this is the guy the who defends McCain as a "true conservative" when he has proven to be conservative, particularly in the fiscal sense, in (last) name only. Personally I would gladly accept all politician's desire to allocate money to earmark/pet projects if they would just stop acting like they don't all do it.
Wisconsin Primary
Not, necessarily Congressional politics, butI like the atricle regardless. Takes a solid look into demographics of the state, along with an excellent multimedia tab on the right. The Delegate Tracker was put together by the AP, touching on what was discussed in class last week; it appears no one has a firm idea on the number of delegates won, the AP has given Obama a clear lead. It will be ineteresting to see what generalizations hold true in the Wisconsin primary as specified by the Journal...
Recession Would Work in Democrats’ Favor
Many say our economy is about to enter into a recession lasting into the summer. Usually this would not be good news, but because the presidential elections are approaching the Democrats are using this news to their advantage. Most likely people will blame the state of the eonomy on the Republicans. With a recession comes higher unemployment rates which the Demcrats will be sure to grab onto saying they can change that. The Democrats' challenge is to not scare voters into believing our economy is about to enter terrible times.
Senate passes passes stimulus bill
Today the Senate passed a bill that will send approximately $170 billion dollars in rebate checks out to the American public. Now with both houses passing the bill and the president already saying he supports the bill, this looks as though it is really going to happen. The main hope from passing this bill is to help out the declining American economy. However I don’t know if this bill will have the effect everyone wants. Government officials are banking on the idea that with those rebate checks many Americans will start spending more. That may not happen though, many Americans may elect just to save or pay off debts with that money. There will probably be a small boost in the economy from the rebate checks but I don’t know if there will be a big enough boost to reach the goals of those who passed the bill.
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/02/07/congress.economy/index.htmlRomney to Quit Race During CPAC Speech
The Former Governor of the Liberal State of Massachusetts is reported to be dropping out of the race for the Republican Nomination. He is behind in delegates almost 3 to 1 to McCain, and even lost ground to Former Arkansas Governor Huckabee. I always wondered how Conservative someone can be who was elected by the same people who keep sending Kennedy, Kerry, and Frank to Congress? I suppose McCain will be the winner of the Republican Nomination unless Huckabee can pull off a miracle. Ron Paul is there too, but let's be realistic, he stands no chance. Which might let Republican's in open primary states vote in the Democratic Primary just to mess with the lefties for a bit. Whoever gets the GOP nod for President, one can be sure he will not be a true conservative, whether that makes him more "electable" to the masses that remains to be seen. I for one have never voted for a Democrat for President in the 3 elections I could legally vote in, and will continue that tradition this November.
Wisconsin Primary
Well, Super Tuesday apparently hasn't lessened the suspense of who will become the Democratic nominee for the Presidency, so it seems like Wisconsin might actually be an exciting place to be on the 19th of this month. I honestly thought it would be too optimistic to think that a black man and a woman would both have an equal chance for the nomination. We'll just have to see. And according to wispolitics.com, voters will get to see a lot of Obama before the primary. It will be interesting, since Doyle is supporting Obama, while Lt. Gov. Barbara Lawton is endorsing Clinton. So it looks like Wisconsin will be more of a battleground for the Democrats rather than the Republicans, since McCain is looking more and more like a sure thing. And it feels good when Wisconsin gets this kind of attention, so I'm looking forward to the "circus coming to town."
White House Defends CIA's Use of Waterboarding in Interrogations
I couldn't believe that this was real. The White House defended the notion that almost drowning a person to get them to talk is acceptable. Fratto defended waterboarding, which is a form of torture, in the event that "an attack might be imminent". Parts of the U.S. are still under high risk for terrorist attack. Does that mean that any day is a day for interrogation? I'm glad that congress is investigating this further.
MPS gets $13 million in grants
I really think it is great that the federal government is making it known that it does realize the problems that we face in Milwaukee with our children. Its great to see that we are not spending all of our money in wars like Iraq or on investigations in congress on sports matters that really do not belong in the governmnent. I really hope this grant will make the program run in a way that will allow the program to continue working even if the grant does not get re-issued. To many times we see grants come into to local areas, work while the grant is being used and then when the grant is over the community is in the same way it was in before the grant came around.
Super Tuesday
Just a little reporting of the Super Tuesday results. McCain feels "confident" enough to call himself the front-runner, and Clinton and Obama results are split. Obama won more states, but Clinton won states with higher delegate counts (California and New York being two of the states with high delegates). McCain currently has 514 votes; Romney has 177. Super Tuesday has made it clear that McCain will most likely be the Republican candidate, but Obama and Clinton appear to be neck in neck still. Clinton has 689 votes and Obama has 582. It is still a close race between the two Democrats. Any predictions whether Clinton or Obama will win???
Really?!
So Obama's a mac and Clinton's a PC. This article really makes me wonder about the amount of free time some people have. There is something to be said about Obama being younger and more tech savoy, but honestly, I doubt that either of them designed their own web page. Having checked out both web pages, I did find Obama's a little less overwhelming, but most of us are used to flashy ads on our websites, and if you're looking for specific information, I think you're able to find it equally well on either site.
Auto Workers Union to Delay Endorsement of Democratic Candidate
The UAW has come out to say that they will not endorse a candidate until one os clearly the nominee. Funny how Democrats are always Pro-Union when they need money. I seem to recall that it was a Democratic Congress that ratified NAFTA after Bill Clinton became President. Also with Obama promising to raise taxes if elected, I don't see how a Union can endorse him. People will have less money to buy things, leading to less profits, less production, and more job losses. Either way it's simply LOSE-LOSE.
Could Giants Win Divide Senate Dems?
With the underdog Giants win in last nights Superbowl in his pocket; Ny Sen. Chuck Schumer got infront of the Senate to praise the team he has loved as kid and in an obvious shoot aim Mass. Sen. Kerry and Kennedy, by calling the game the "one of the greatest upsets in Superbowl history". Schumer also introduced a resolution praising his teams victory over the New England Patriots. His bill is cosponsered by fellow Ny Sen. Clinton and Both Nj Senators Lautenburg and Menendez; Senators Kerry and Kennedy were unavilable for comment.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/04/AR2008020401990.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/04/AR2008020401990.html
GREAT budget proposal...(thats sarcasm)
The budget proposed today by President Bush is honestly hard to read much less think about. The thing that really gets me is the whole cutting $14.2 billion from federal health care programs. For those of you who watched the State of the Union last week, you'll recall that one of the proposals made was more affordable and accessible health care for Americans. For those of you who didn't have the pleasure of watching, take a look at the White House website...you'll see it right there. (http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/01/20060131-7.html). The plan also eliminates a program that trains pediatricians and pediatric sub-specialists at children's teaching hospitals. Something else that caught my eye is the fact that beyond 2009 nothing is set aside for war costs. Is that a promise to get us out of Iraq? Maybe we should allow for a third term...NOT.
PS Take a look at the reader comments...they're pretty amusing.
PS Take a look at the reader comments...they're pretty amusing.
Senator Spector to meet with NFL Commissioner over Cheating
Similiar to the begining of Congressional inquries on MLB steriod use. For baseball, Congress used the "public health" catchall to justify their interest in the matter. This time it appears that any official Congressional actions will be under the rallying cry of "violations of anti-trust agreement" the NFL operations unders. At the current moment, Spector is going alone on the issue, but he is the chair of the judicial committee... which may soon find this issue more intriging and marketable than the other issues they could be examining...
a Scramble for Funds
This article reviewed possibilities for presidential candidates to swoop up support for freshly abandoned presidential candidates (Edwards and Giuliani). It was said that Obama and Clinton scrambled for the funds and all that I could imagine were little piranhas with Obama and Clinton heads swimming towards the disposed of corpse that is fundraising for the resigned candidates.
After reading the King article, campaigning for funds and who is giving money to what and why, made me worry about our current campaigning system. Is it possible to limit the amount of funds that each candidate spends on campaigning?
If limits were set, maybe some of the time spent campaigning could be devoted to drafting pieces of legislation that would better the welfare of the citizens.
After reading the King article, campaigning for funds and who is giving money to what and why, made me worry about our current campaigning system. Is it possible to limit the amount of funds that each candidate spends on campaigning?
If limits were set, maybe some of the time spent campaigning could be devoted to drafting pieces of legislation that would better the welfare of the citizens.
Illlegal Immigrants Receiving $600
This is my first time blogging, so please bear with me. I was watching CNN last night and heard that illegal immigrants will also be receiving the $600 that we would be receiving. I'm not sure if I like that idea. After that segment was over, I also watched the segment on how the FDA is underfunded. Hmm....that really draws an interesting conclusion in my head. How is it that we are able to give free money to illegal immigrants, but can't even afford to fund the FDA which makes sure our products are safe???
Endorsements...
McCain has recently got endorsements from Governor Schwarzenegger and Guiliani, who recently dropped out of the 2008 Presidential race. Both of these endorsements could be huge for him. Gov. Schwarzenegger's support could help McCain with the California primary coming up next Tuesday. Also, New York Republicans who were rooting for Guiliani have now swayed their support to McCain. Although McCain and Romney are the two front-runners for the Republicans, McCain sure has a lot of positive support leaning his way.
Bush Calls on Congress to Extend Telecom Spying Provisions
Bush wants an extension of the Protect America Act. This act allows the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) to intercept e-mails and phone calls of suspected terrorists without having to obtain a court warrant first. Bush addressed this in his State of the Union address asking for Congress to act before it expires on Friday.
Bush said, "This means that if you do not act by Friday, our ability to track terrorist threats would be weakened and our citizens will be in greater danger. Congress must ensure the flow of vital intelligence is not disrupted."
Our citizens will be in greater danger??? I think there are many more things Bush should be worrying about that put us in danger...
Bush said, "This means that if you do not act by Friday, our ability to track terrorist threats would be weakened and our citizens will be in greater danger. Congress must ensure the flow of vital intelligence is not disrupted."
Our citizens will be in greater danger??? I think there are many more things Bush should be worrying about that put us in danger...
Edwards exits presidential race
I believe it is really big that Edwards decided to drop out in the democratic race. Within the article is states with the two representatives who are left for the Democratic nomination, we have history in the making. I would have to agree with that statement. The fact that a female candidate now has a 50 percent chance of winning the presidential nomination has never been heard of before now. However, with Edwards dropping out it brings up the question on whether this really will hurt Clinton on more ways than help her. I believe there are many Americans who are not ready for a female president at this time and will then resort to voting for Obama just for the aspect. It will be interesting to see how this race will turn out in the voters votes and who the final nomination will go to.
Two More G.O.P. Congressmen Won’t Run
It seems that there is a growing list of Republican congresspeople who will not be running for reelection in 2008. Is this significant news? Do you think incumbent Republicans deciding not to run has anything to do with Democrats' 2006 win in Congress or the upcoming Presidential election?
Democratic Punishment?
I find it really strange that the democratic party is punishing certain states for moving their primaries. While I can see it may be difficult for candidates find time to visit these states where they werent planning to campaign so early, it seems non-democratic to not acknowledge the voters of certain states and still consider the outcome candidate legitimate. These states in particular tend to decide elections, and I would think that the democratic party come election time wouldn't want the voters of these states to resent the party for not considering their votes. This could really be the downfall of the democratic nominee. It seems as though the party is more concerned with controling what is going on than reaching a desired outcome. The article we just read about the vulnerability of representatives talked a lot about how our parties are losing power in a way, and our candidates are being viewed as individuals rather than as representatives of a party. This may be the party's way of saying "hey look, we're still here and we have some control over what's going on."
I'm Gonna Get $600
There are some interesting differences between the passed House plan and what the Senate apparently wants - caps on tax rebates, changes in business loss deductions, payments to Social Security recipients, etc. Mostly a debate over how much to spend - roughly $196B Senate version vs. $161 for the House. If they're really convinced that this will stimulate the economy that may or may not be in a recession (depending on who you ask and when you ask them), what's another $30 billion?
The new "Contract With America"; Gingrich's "Platform of the American People"
Last Thursday I had the pleasure of hearing Newt Gingrich speak at a Republican Party of Wisconsin fundraiser here in Milwaukee. While the former speaker spent an ample amount of time recounting his time as speaker, he spoke at length about his 'think-tank of sorts,' American Solutions.
As one of it's glaring accomplishments is the completion of "The Platform of the American People." So basically stated:
As one of it's glaring accomplishments is the completion of "The Platform of the American People." So basically stated:
[The Platform of the American People is...] A Red, White, and Blue platform to
replace the Red versus Blue partisan Split.
This Platform details the results of six national polls along a variety of issue areas. The poll was administered to self-identified Republicans, Democrats, and Independents. Taking the majority answers together on all sides of the spectrum and averaging them to find the mean, Gingrinch and American Solutions were presented with a product of bipartisan support.
The relation of The Platform to our coverage of spatial models is important. Support on the issue-specific areas within The Platform's support is listed as one number [both support for, and against], it is an average, or mean of the likened responses of the both Republicans, Democrats, and Independents.
While the numbers themselves do not necessarily correspond with different issue stances, because issues were measured in support for, or against, we are not presented with a middle, or mean of issue stances. In essence, The Platform contains issue items that are the middle, and generate positive response from all respondents regardless of party affiliation.
Gingrich hopes The Platform is adopted by local, state, and with hope national parties as a means to unify the American people. Gingrich does not rule out the divisive issues that will forever pit Republicans against Democrats- simply, he wishes to provide for the parties, issues that can unify and not divide.
While I realize the uptopian nature of such a platform, it presents possibilities for unifying issues between Republicans and Democrats. While the feasibility may be challenged on a national level, state and local politics could be greatly affected by adopting such a platform.
Ted, Patrick, Caroline Kennedy Endorse Obama
Senator Kennedy joins fellow Massachusetts Senator Kerry in endorsing Obama for President. The article explains why the Senator decided to do this, and goes further into detail on who other members of the Kennedy family will endorse. This may be good for getting the Far Left to endorse Obama, but I am not sure that this will do anything to get Conservative Democrats or Liberal Republicans to vote for him. Elections are not won by winning the extremist vote, but the moderate to independent. Furthermore I doubt that adding a Flip-flopper in Kerry, and alcoholic murderer in Kennedy will make anyone change their mind in who to support. In fact I think that it might even turn some people off. I even remember seeing a bumper sticker that once said: "My gun has killed less people than Ted Kennedy's car", a fact that has sunk his every Presidential Bid, and which may be an obstacle for Senator Obama. In the end all this may be for nothing as many see Obama as unqualified for the job, which I agree, making Senator Clinton the nominee, who is equally as unelectable paving the way for another Republican Victory in November.
What?!?!?
When I started to read this article I thought it was going to be about a federal power showdown between the democrats in congress and the president. The more I read the more absurd it sounded. The article is about the president calling for congress to cut earmarks in halve and that he would veto any spending bill that was sent to him if the earmarks were out of controll. President Bush fighing earmarks seemed crazy to me for several reasons. First, you never heard any talk from the White House or congressional republicians about stopping out of controll earmark spending when they were in control of the purse; it seems to me that now that the republicians dont control the spending they now have a problem with out of control spending when they have failed to have a balanced budget for years. Second, what new spending bills does the president congress is going to be sending him any time soon. All the spending bills for the remainder of his term have already been past. So I hope you find this article as amusing as I did.
Protect America Act...helpful or dangerous for Americans?
Saturday came with a threat by the White House that the President will veto a proposal to expand the cleverly named Protect America Act by 30 days instead of making it permanent. The act is due to expire on Thursday evening. The article at hand outlines arguments on both sides of the debate. Many Democrats, not wanting to look soft on the threat of terrorism but trying to protect civil liberties, oppose the idea of permanence as well as immunity for telecommunications companies facing multiple lawsuits for warrantless wiretapping following the attacks in September of 2001. The 30 day expansion is, in large part, meant to give time for coming up with a new surveillance legislation. The threat of a veto seems incredibly premature and impatient. With an issue as important as this, and one that has the extreme potential to disrupt civil liberties, it is essential that legislation is carefully thought out and finally written. Could this push have something to do with a particularly important speech the President is to give on...ohhh say...Monday night?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)